Thursday, 20 February 2025

Loan Fraud Syndicate Involving Bank Officers, Celebrities!

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has uncovered a massive loan fraud and money laundering syndicate through Op Sky, which involved bank officers, a financial consulting firm, and even local celebrities. The scheme targeted blacklisted civil servants who could not get bank loans. Corrupt bank officers referred them to a financial consulting firm, which forged documents to secure multiple loans from different banks. The firm took a 35% cut of the loan amount and invested the rest in its own scheme.

The firm used public figures as ambassadors to promote its services on social media, at roadshows, and even through charity events targeting teachers and government workers. Celebrities allegedly received payments between RM150,000 and RM400,000 for endorsing the firm. MACC also found concert sponsorships and songs commissioned for the syndicate.

Source:https://en.wikipedia.org

MACC’s action so far is as follows:

· 98 bank accounts frozen (over RM22 mil)

· 9 luxury cars, RM300,000 cash, 17 luxury watches, and 5 designer handbags seized

· 27 arrests, including 18 bank officers and 8 consultancy firm employees

Celebrities Implicated in Op Sky include:
1. Datuk Jalaluddin Hassan (Actor)
2. Datuk Dr Sheikh Muszaphar Shukor (Astronaut)
3. Ziana Zain (Singer)

These celebrities have provided statements but are not officially suspects. MACC has now reached the final stage of its investigation.

The scheme is part of a broader loan scheme with commission in single or early double digits. Unscrupulous individuals, firms participate in such shenanigans. How do we reduce these activities? Employing people with integrity is helpful but not a fail-safe solution. Another is to use service “auditors” who may act as “bogus” applicants to flush-out the individuals involved. This must be carefully worked-out with the authorities.

Corruption and greed are not just in banking or finance. It has become pervasive in the eco system. We need a set of courts to adjudicate and dispose quickly cases of corruption in this country. But will we do it?

Reference:

MACC busts massive loan fraud syndicate involving bank officers, celebrities, Focus Malaysia, 9 January 2025

 

Wednesday, 19 February 2025

World Bank: Malaysia’s Latest Income Inequality Trends!

Malaysia has the highest rate of income inequality among peers nearing high-income status. Intra-ethnic disparity is the biggest contributor despite the widely held belief that wage gaps between races are bigger. This is according to the World Bank’s latest report released on 5 February 2025. 

The Bank said despite pro-poor growth, income is still highly concentrated at the top. Income has grown more rapidly for the poor and for people in the middle of the income distribution, but because they started from a low base, absolute gaps remain. As of 2022, the bottom 20 per cent of people in Malaysia held less than 6 per cent of income, up from just 4.6 per cent in 2004. The share of income held by the Top 20 per cent of the distribution fell from 46 per cent in 2004 to 41 per cent in 2022. In 2022, labour share of income was likely below the 45 per cent target set by the government as part of the Madani Economic Framework.

 

Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org

 \Employment remains the main source of income for Malaysian households. Salaries and wages represent 50–60 per cent of household income, and self-employment income accounts for almost 40 per cent, the Bank noted. The rich, on the other hand, derive additional income from capital, which is not taxed. Capital ownership is highly concentrated among top income earners, with the richest 10 per cent of Malaysian households holding 70 per cent of total wealth, meaning that this outsized income share benefits the richer few. This concentration of wealth and income is reinforced by the differences in skills premium across income distribution. 

The premium to higher education, be it vocational or university, typically results in an upward slope, which means that for the same level of education, richer workers in Malaysia receive a larger return than poorer workers do. Several factors explain the lower return for poor workers.

One of them is that poorer children learn less at school than richer children and tend not to pursue fields that yield high salaries. Many also do not graduate with the skills that are in demand and are usually forced to take up the same types of jobs. Decline in household size among the poor is also likely a factor. 

The Bank noted fertility rates, and consequently household size, have plummeted in Malaysia, especially among the poor. This trend contributed to the decline in inequality in 2004–14, when average household size fell 5.3 per cent. The decline was much greater for households in the poorest 40 per cent of the distribution, particularly households in the poorest 10 per cent, among which average household size fell almost 10 per cent. 

The report said the current inequality level means that the high-income prosperity is not yet within the reach of many people in the country. At 39, Malaysia’s Gini index, a measure of the distribution of income across a population, is higher than that of economies that recently achieved high-income status (mean of 31) and established high-income countries (mean of 30). Malaysia has the third-highest Gini (in the region) after the Philippines and Thailand. (That is a measure of inequality, the higher the figure the more inequal is income distribution). 

We are so focused on growth, that inequalities within each race is causing some social tension. That together with corruption and cost of living are the profound problems facing Malaysia. Madani has not got off the firing line in all three areas and remain distracted by race and religion (or is it ham and socks)? 

Reference:

Malaysia’s latest income inequality trends explained, according to the World Bank, Syed Jaymal Zahiid, Malay Mail, 5 Feb 2025

Tuesday, 18 February 2025

Will Malaysia Achieve Its 40% Renewable Energy Target by 2035?

In 2021, Malaysia’s Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources announced a goal of 31% renewable capacity by 2025. By 2035, it should increase to 40%. Upon releasing the National Energy Policy, the government pledged to build up 18.4 GW of renewable capacity by 2040. 

GlobalData’s latest report reveals that Malaysia is advancing toward its goal, and there is a real possibility that renewables will account for 40% of the country’s energy capacity by 2035.

Currently, renewables make up 13.3% of the total. The current trajectory reveals that Malaysia is on course to achieve 18.2% renewable energy capacity by 2025. By 2035, its share should rise to 36.4%.

Source: GlobalData

While Malaysia steadily advances towards its targets according to Malaysia renewable energy roadmap (MyRER), its clean energy mix comprises only three renewable sources. These include solar, biopower and hydropower.

According to data by IRENA, Malaysia has 9 GW in installed clean energy capacity, up from 7.5 GW in 2018. Solar accounts for 1.9 GW – the third-biggest in ASEAN after Vietnam and Thailand. The share of bioenergy sits at 0.9 GW. With 6.2 GW, hydropower accounts for the biggest share in Malaysia’s clean energy mix at 69.9%.

Malaysia’s Renewable Energy Resource Potential. Source: IRENA

There are arguments that Malaysia’s conditions are unfavourable to wind power development. The reason is the low wind speeds of around 2 m/s. Although they can get up to 11 m/s in high-altitude regions, the countrywide average annual wind speed is less than the recommended for small wind (4 m/s) and utility-scale turbines (5.8 m/s) to become viable. In total, studies estimate the maximum wind power potential in the country at between 500 MW and 2 GW.

So far, Malaysia’s efforts to expand its clean power mix beyond solar, biomass and hydropower have fallen short. GlobalData’s analysis notes that while the country made efforts to explore geothermal power in 2015 with a 30 MW project, the plans were scrapped. The government also hasn’t prioritised onshore wind due to unfavourable wind speeds during the off seasons. For example, on the country’s east coast, which has the strongest winds, wind speed declines by 50% between seasons. This variability makes it difficult to depend on wind energy. It also explains why Malaysia has just one small 0.2 MW onshore wind plant in operation.

Malaysia’s clean energy market is still in its infancy and remains underdeveloped. As a result, it would need massive investments to get up and running.

IRENA warns that Malaysia would need more ambitious targets to align with a 1.5°C-compatible scenario. By 2030, solar PV alone would have to scale up to 17.1 GW in capacity. This would require around USD 10.8 billion in investments. In total, aligning with a 1.5°C scenario would require energy transition investments to top USD 415 billion by 2050. 


 Selected Technology Scale-up and Investment Needs to 2030

Under 1.5°C Scenario. Source: IRENA

Raising the needed investments would require enhancing the policy support for clean energy and overcoming existing barriers, including project bankability.

Malaysia has launched three key policies to accelerate renewable power deployment: the Renewable Energy Act, the National Renewable Energy Policy and Action Plan and the Sustainable Energy Development Authority Act. Other efforts that the Malaysian government has undertaken include extending the Green Investment Tax Allowance and Green Income Tax Exemption until 2023. For solar leasing companies, the latter measure was extended to December 2026.

“In addition, the government has feed-in tariffs for up to 1 MW capacity and net metering policies in place to encourage the adoption of renewables,” notes Sudeshna Sarmah, power analyst at GlobalData. 

According to Sarmah, encouraging foreign investments towards setting up large-scale renewable projects is among the measures that can further push the country towards achieving its renewable energy goals.

IRENA notes that the Malaysian government can also work to shorten project approval times and improve the financing landscape through new and existing mechanisms like power purchasing agreements and tariff rates to ease and stimulate clean energy project developers. Accelerating grid infrastructure capacity buildup and ensuring its stability and flexibility are also crucial measures for adopting renewables at scale and connecting with neighbouring countries.

While scaling up financing might be a major barrier to Malaysia’s energy transition, it isn’t the only one, as the country’s economy remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels. It is Southeast Asia’s second-largest oil and natural gas producer and the fifth-leading LNG exporter globally.

Source: OurWorldInData

However, according to estimates, the country’s petroleum reserves will last only for another 15 years. While production has become challenging, the country continues to maintain robust natural gas activity with recent investment and planned exploration efforts, according to an analysis by Rystad Energy.

Furthermore, the Central Bank of Malaysia estimates that the country spends around 12% of its GDP on fossil fuel subsidies. This is significantly higher than the global average of 8.1%, and way above most regional peers.

The government has made some progress, including planning to reduce coal reliance by 50% by 2035 and completely retire its plants by 2045. Building upon those efforts would unlock massive economic benefits. 

Considering its potential, Malaysia is lagging in its renewable energy transition. However, the government’s targets promise that this process will accelerate in the near future. By 2050, Malaysia aims for renewables to have a 70% share in its electricity mix. Furthermore, the country plans to take advantage of its rich raw resources, establishing itself as a leader in solar power module manufacturing and advancing in other green industries, such as EV battery development. It will also set up an exchange hub for cross-border renewable energy trading.

With Trump, fossil fuels may have just extended their life cycle. Coal and gas will remain important since the U.S. (President) does not subscribe to climate change. What happens after 2028 is anybody’s guess! Meanwhile, we could “pause” the dismantling or shutting down of coal plants to provide energy security in the immediate term.

 

Reference:

Malaysia nears its 40% renewable energy target by 2025, Viktor Tachev, Energy Tracker Asia, 5 August 2024

Monday, 17 February 2025

The 5 Basic Laws of Human Stupidity

There’s an internet adage that goes, “Debating an idiot is like trying to play chess with a pigeon — it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.” It’s funny and astute. It’s also deeply, depressingly worrying. Although we’d never say so, we all have people in our lives we think of as a bit dim — not necessarily about everything, but certainly about some things. 

In 1976, Professor Cipolla published a 60-page essay describing the fundamental laws of a force he perceived as the greatest existential threat to humanity: stupidity.

 

He divides humanity into four main categories: Intelligent, Bandit, Helpless, Stupid. All are defined based on a win/lose concept, slightly echoing the prisoner’s dilemma.

 

Law 1: Everyone always and inevitably underestimates the number of stupid people in circulation

 

No matter how many idiots you suspect you are surrounded by, you are invariably underestimating the total.

 

Law 2: The probability that a person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.

 

There are stupid people in every nation on Earth. How many idiots are there among us? Impossible to answer. Moreover, any assumption would certainly violate the first law.

 

Law 3. A stupid person is a person who causes losses to another person or group of people when he or she does not benefit and may even suffer losses.

 

Cipolla calls it the golden law of stupidity. A stupid person, according to the economist, is a person who causes problems for others without any clear benefit for himself.

 

This law also introduces three other phenotypes that, according to Cipolla, coexist with stupidity. First, there is the intelligent person, whose actions benefit both himself and others. Then comes the bandit, who gets rich at the expense of others. And finally, the abused, the defenceless person, whose actions enrich others at his own expense. Cipolla imagined the four types along a graph, like this:

 


  

Essentially stupid people are dangerous and harmful because reasonable people find it difficult to imagine and understand unreasonable behaviour. An intelligent person can understand the logic of a bandit. The actions of the bandit follow a pattern of rationality: a wicked rationality indeed, but always rational. The bandit wants an advantage for his account.

 

With a stupid person, all this is impossible, as the third fundamental law explains. The stupid person will harass you without any reason, without any advantage, without any plan, at the most improbable times and places.

 

This analysis leads to law number 4:

 

Law 4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the destructive power of stupid individuals.

 

Non-stupid people constantly forget that at all times, in all places, and under all circumstances, dealing and/or associating with stupid people is always a costly mistake. We underestimate idiots, and we do so at our peril. This brings us to the fifth and final law:

 

Law 5: A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

 

And its direct consequence: a stupid person is more dangerous than a bandit.

There is no defence against stupidity. The only way for a society to avoid being crushed by the burden of its idiots is for the non-stupid to work even harder to compensate for the losses of the stupid. When you draw the parallel with the environment, and some people trying to make up for other people’s bullshit, Cipolla was not far from the truth.

 

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the theologian, argues that stupidity is worse than evil because stupidity can be manipulated and used by evil. He also argues that stupidity tends to go together with acquiring power — that is, being in power means we surrender our individual critical faculties. When we know something or someone is evil, we can take steps to fight it. With stupidity, it is much more difficult.

 

The lesson from Bonhoeffer is to laugh at those daft, silly moments when in close company. But we should get angry and scared when stupidity takes reign, like in the U.S.

 

References:

The 5 basic laws of human stupidity, Thomas Wagner, Bonpote.com, 21 June 2022

Bonhoeffer’s “theory of stupidity”: We have more to hear from stupid people than evil ones, Jonny Thomson, Big Think

Friday, 14 February 2025

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI App!

A Chinese-made artificial intelligence (AI) model called DeepSeek has shot to the top of Apple Store's downloads. Released on 20 January, it quickly impressed AI experts before it got the attention of the entire tech industry - and the world. US President Donald Trump said it was a "wake-up call" for US companies who must focus on "competing to win". 

What makes DeepSeek so special is the company's claim that it was built at a fraction of the cost of industry-leading models like OpenAI - because it uses fewer advanced chips. That possibility caused chip-making giant Nvidia to shed almost $600bn (£482bn) of its market value - the biggest one-day loss in US history.

 

Source: Wikipedia

 

AI can, at times, make a computer seem like a person. A machine uses the technology to learn and solve problems, typically by being trained on massive amounts of information and recognising patterns. The result is software that can have conversations like a person or predict people's shopping habits. In recent years, it has become best known as the tech behind chatbots such as ChatGPT - and DeepSeek - also known as generative AI. These programs again learn from huge swathes of data.

 

Millions of people use tools such as ChatGPT to help them with everyday tasks like writing emails, summarising text, and answering questions - and others even use them to help with basic coding and studying.

 

DeepSeek is the free AI-powered chatbot, which looks, feels and works very much like ChatGPT. That means it's used for many of the same tasks, though exactly how well it works compared to its rivals is up for debate. It is reportedly as powerful as OpenAI's o1 model - released at the end of 2023 - in tasks including mathematics and coding.

 

Like o1, R1 is a "reasoning" model. These models produce responses incrementally, simulating a process similar to how humans’ reason through problems or ideas. It uses less memory than its rivals, ultimately reducing the cost to perform tasks.

 

Like many other Chinese AI models, DeepSeek is trained to avoid politically sensitive questions. When the BBC asked the app what happened at Tiananmen Square on 4 June 1989, DeepSeek did not give any details about the topic in China.

 

But DeepSeek's base model appears to have been trained via accurate sources while introducing a layer of censorship or withholding certain information via an additional safeguarding layer. Deepseek says it has been able to do this cheaply - researchers behind it claim it cost $6m (£4.8m) to train, a fraction of the "over $100m" alluded to by OpenAI boss Sam Altman when discussing GPT-4. DeepSeek's founder reportedly built up a store of Nvidia A100 chips, which have been banned from export to China since September 2022. Some experts believe this collection - which some estimates put at 50,000 - led him to build such a powerful AI model, by pairing these chips with cheaper, less sophisticated ones.

 

DeepSeek was founded in December 2023 by Liang Wenfeng. Not much is known about Liang, who graduated from Zhejiang University with degrees in electronic information engineering and computer science. But he now finds himself in the international spotlight. Unlike many American AI entrepreneurs who are from Silicon Valley, Mr Liang also has a background in finance. He is the CEO of a hedge fund called High-Flyer, which uses AI to analyse financial data to make investment decisons - what is called quantitative trading. In 2019 High-Flyer became the first quant hedge fund in China to raise over 100 billion yuan ($13m).

 

DeepSeek's achievements undercut the belief that bigger budgets and top-tier chips are the only ways of advancing AI, a prospect which has created uncertainty about the future of high-performance chips.

 

My own experience with DeepSeek is that it helps draft responses to emails, improves productivity and reduces cost. I will keep to DeepSeek for now. It is a good alternative to Claude or CoPilot.

 

References:

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking, Kelly Ng, Brandon Drenon, Tom Gerken and Marc Cieslak, BBC News, 29 January 2025

 

Alibaba releases AI model it says surpasses DeepSeek, Eduardo Baptista, Reuters, 30 January 2025

 

Thursday, 13 February 2025

Law to Mandate Minimum 2% of GDP for R&D?

Malaysia is considering a bold legislative move to enhance its research and development (R&D) sector by proposing the Science, Technology and Innovation Act, which would mandate a minimum spending of 2% of gross domestic product in R&D said the Minister. He said this in parliament. Although the budget for his ministry has increased in recent years, more investment is needed, and legislation will help ensure this. 

Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org

  Most nations lack a legal framework to enforce R&D spending as a percentage of their GDP, countries like China and South Korea have set ambitious goals to boost R&D investment and drive innovation. China’s 13th Five-Year Plan, which concluded in 2020, targeted R&D expenditure to reach 2.5% of GDP. Meanwhile, South Korea has aimed to allocate at least 4% of its GDP to R&D. Malaysia’s investment in R&D has fluctuated significantly over the past years, with the gross expenditure on R&D last peaking at RM17.7 billion in 2016. As of 2020, Malaysia allocates barely 1% of its GDP to R&D, falling behind nations such as South Korea (4%), Taiwan (3.54%) and Singapore (2.2%). 

In a World Bank blog, William Maloney wrote that poor countries invest far less in R&D as a share of GDP. Middle income countries invest well under 0.5%, compared to 3% in advanced nations. 

It is not just the percentage (3%) but what is more important is that for effective R&D spending, it is the people that are needed to generate and employ knowledge. For Malaysia, we want STEM to flourish but constraints overwhelm opportunities. There is a need for an ecosystem, funding availability, research to commercialisation and a healthy, competitive environment for the next DeepSeek to arise or a new oil palm product to emerge. We do have government sponsored entities like RRI or PORIM, but to my mind they show very little tangible results – Why?

Reference:

Govt mulls law to mandate minimum 2% of GDP for R&D, FMT Reporters, 11 August 2024

Wednesday, 12 February 2025

GLC and GLIC Governance: What’s Best?

Malaysian government-linked investment companies (GLICs) have grown making them the “poster child” of the country’s economic success. But GLICs’ corporate and investment decisions have become increasingly more difficult and complex. With combined assets under management of over RM1.8 trillion, GLICs are as big as the Malaysian economy in value. They are also some of the biggest lenders to the government. 

For example, the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) and the Retirement Fund Inc (KWAP) alone own about 30% of the Malaysian Government Securities (MGS) and Government Investment Issue (GII). The other GLICs are Khazanah Nasional Bhd, Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB), Lembaga Tabung Haji, the Armed Forces Fund Board (LTAT) and Minister of Finance Inc (MoF Inc). There is also Petroliam Nasional Bhd or Petronas. While it is not considered a GLIC, it is a massive cash cow that could be misused in the absence of good oversight. These entities have an entrenched presence across the Malaysian economy and have been criticised for crowding out private investments.

 

Source: https://ms.wikipedia.org

 

As revealed by economist Edmund Terence Gomez in 2017, the GLICs controlled over 68,000 government-linked companies (GLCs) directly and indirectly. As it is, the sheer size of GLICs presents a growing challenge with regard to how the monies are managed. Another challenge is to ensure proper corporate governance, free from political interference and internal abuse of power. While there are check-and-balance mechanisms for internal and external oversight, Centre to Combat Corruption & Cronyism (C4 Centre) chief executive officer (CEO) says significant gaps remain. Many GLICs, he argues, are plagued by conflict-of-interest issues.

 

Given the gaps in oversight, there have been many examples of failed or mismanaged investments by GLICs. These include the globally known 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) scandal, the crises in LTAT’s Boustead group of companies that included the non-delivery of six littoral combat ships (LCS) as well as Tabung Haji’s failed property and equities investments that eventually required government intervention worth RM19.9bil. There is also the case where government guarantees from the Finance Ministry led KWAP to lend RM4bil to the infamous SRC International Sdn Bhd.

 

Realising the need for greater accountability, beginning from Nov 1, the Auditor-General has been authorised to audit 1,856 entities – up from 925 previously – including GLCs. While it is a positive move, an audit typically unearths irregularities after they take place. In fact, in some cases like 1MDB, international accounting firms such as Deloitte and KPMG signed off all 1MDB’s accounts from financial year 2010 (FY10) to FY14, despite the dubious transactions that were taking place. It is also impossible for the Auditor-General to audit all entities on an annual basis and this likely prevents irregularities from being identified early on.

 

The administration of Prime Minister understands this. Under the National Governance Strengthening Movement, a new circular was issued to enhance the governance of GLICs, GLCs and companies limited by guarantee (CLBG). The circular seeks to increase the accountability of ministries in providing oversight on the governance of SBK and CLBG under their responsibility. It prohibited the same individual from holding the roles of chairperson and CEO of GLICs, GLCs or CLBG simultaneously.

 

The board of directors of the entities must also consist of at least one-third independent directors. Any individual who has served a GLIC, GLC and CLBG as an adviser or officer can only be appointed as independent director after three years from the date of retirement or cease of service. Interestingly, the circular did not prohibit the appointment of politicians as the chairperson or directors of GLICs, GLCs and CLBG.

 

To an extent, the bipartisan Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has been examining several key irregularities including the non-delivery of six LCS worth RM9bil by Boustead Naval Shipyard Sdn Bhd and the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda). However, there should not be over-reliance on the PAC. Some observers have noted that Parliament’s special select committees have not been utilised to the fullest.

 

Currently, there are 10 select committees such as Finance and Economy; Health; Infrastructure, Transportation and Communication as well as Environment, Science and Plantations.

 

These committees can also play a greater role in examining government-related entities and large-scale projects, based on the focus of the select committee. To achieve this, the select committees should be able to hold public or private hearings in Parliament by summoning key government officials, including ministers, if necessary. If the MPs in the committee get external help from consultants or think-tanks to provide analysis and insights, the select committees could have a bigger impact. A bigger budget is necessary.

 

For Parliament to play a more active and effective oversight role, the MPs could benefit from training or briefing from domestic and international research institutes, experts, think-tanks and civil society organisations that do specific research on the topics. Additionally, the MPs should be supported by capable and adequate research officers. In other countries, comprehensive scrutiny by MPs happens because they are supported by adequate and capable research officers. At the moment, our MPs have minimal support. GLC and GLIC board members should be composed primarily of independent, non-partisan professionals and also be subject to term limits to prevent the entrenchment of power and influence.

 

We need not only transparent, accountable GLCs (and GLICs), but more effective monitoring of their investments and programmes. Quality of leadership is key to success of an organisation. If the Chairperson and Board members are qualified professionals with integrity, chances are it will be run well. But in Malaysia, we have politicians running some GLCs with clear conflicts of interest! So, it becomes difficult for satisfactory results and we move from one scandal to another. The best way forward is for oversight by various Parliamentary select committees with open, public hearings on their programmes and results.

 

Reference:

Fine-tuning GLIC governance, Ganeshwaran Kana, Star Biz7, 07 Dec 2024

Monday, 10 February 2025

Mass Deportations in the U.S. is Catastrophic!

The U.S. immigration system could be broken but immigrants are crucial to growing the labour force and supporting economic output. Immigrants have helped expand the labour supply, pay nearly $580 billion a year in taxes and possess a spending power of $1.6 trillion a year. 

The Trump administration has started mass deportations. Depending on how many immigrants are deported, these mass deportations would:  

· Reduce real gross domestic product (GDP) by as much as 7.4% by 2028, 

· Reduce the supply of workers for key industries, including by up to 225,000 workers in agriculture and 1.5 million workers in construction,

· Push prices up to 9.1% higher by 2028, and 

· Cost 44,000 U.S.-born workers their jobs for every half a million immigrants who are removed from the labour force.  

This is the assessment by the Joint Economic Committee of U.S. Congress. 

Estimates from the Peterson Institute for International Economics show that if 8.3 million undocumented immigrants are deported, GDP would be 7.4% lower and employment would be 7.0% lower by 2028. This 7.4% reduction in GDP over four years would likely mean that the U.S. economy would not grow at all during President Trump’s second term. Even if 1.3 million undocumented immigrants are deported, GDP would drop by 1.2% and employment would drop by 1.1% by 2028.   

The American Immigration Council has estimated that a long-term deportation—deporting one million people each year until there is no undocumented population—could amount to a 4.2% to 6.8% loss in GDP (totalling $1.1 to $1.7 trillion in losses), with the effects felt most acutely in California, Florida, and Texas. To put this in context, the economy shrank by 4.3% during the Great Recession.  

The researchers also find that this deportation plan would cut $23 billion in funds for Social Security and $6 billion from Medicare each year because these workers would no longer pay into these programs.  

The effects of mass deportations could be greater if additional documented immigrants or U.S. citizen family members also leave the country. People in mixed-status families who are either U.S.-born children or green card holders may be caught up in deportation sweeps or leave themselves if undocumented members of their family are deported.  

Evidence also shows that deportations reduce employment for U.S.-born workers. Deportation initiatives from past administrations actually led to net reductions in employment and earnings in the short- and long-term for U.S.-born workers, with the worst impacts falling on the least educated and most vulnerable. An analysis of past deportation operations estimates that for every half a million immigrants removed from the labour force due to enforcement, 44,000 U.S.-born workers lose their jobs. 

Undocumented immigrants make up a relatively small share of the overall labour force—between 4.4% and 5.4% since 2003—but they have outsized roles in industries like construction, agriculture, health care, and hospitality. They grow, pick, and process Americans’ food; build homes in communities across the country; and provide in-home care to seniors and others. Without immigrant labour, these industries would face labour shortages, further exacerbating their need for labour. In addition, the United States would lose workers that were educated in the U.S. Over 15% of undocumented workers have a bachelor’s degree or higher, and nearly half a million are currently enrolled in U.S. colleges and universities.  

Many industries already face labour shortages or are projected to face a shortage of workers in the coming decades. There were 282,000 job openings in construction in September 2024, and one study estimated the construction industry will need an additional 454,000 workers above the normal pace of hiring to meet the demand for labour in 2025. The American Immigration Council estimates that mass deportations would remove up to 1.5 million workers from the construction industry, 225,000 from agriculture, one million from hospitality, 870,000 from manufacturing, and 461,000 from transportation and warehousing. 

The labour shortages that result from mass deportations would raise costs for all Americans. With unemployment near a historic low, employers in sectors like agriculture and construction would produce less, resulting in shortages and higher prices. Economists at the Peterson Institute for International Economics estimate that deporting 1.3 million immigrants would raise prices by 1.5% by 2028, while deporting 8.3 million immigrants would raise prices by 9.1%. Additionally, mass deportations would reduce consumer spending, as undocumented workers are not just workers but also consumers. If demand for certain goods and services slows enough, demand for workers in those sectors may also slow, and some businesses may be forced to lay off workers.  

Importantly, both immigrant and U.S.-born workers between the ages of 25 and 64 are employed at higher rates now than they were before the pandemic (see graph below), signalling that the strong labour market in recent years has benefitted both immigrants and U.S.-born workers alike. Evidence from the last few decades shows that immigrants do not take jobs from U.S.-born workers or bring down wages for similarly-skilled workers. This is especially true when there are lots of job openings, like there were during the post-pandemic recovery. A recent analysis from the Brookings Institution estimates that U.S.-born and immigrant employment actually increased more than expected in 2023, despite previous data pointing to a decrease in U.S.-born employment. A recent study even showed that immigrants can actually boost wages and employment for U.S.-born workers. 



While immigrants make up about 14% of the U.S. population, they represent about a fifth of the self-employed workforce and account for a quarter of start-up founders. Many immigrants find success in their entrepreneurial pursuits: 55% of the companies valued at or above $1 billion in the United States were founded by immigrants and more than 40% of the Fortune 500 companies in 2021 were founded by an immigrant or the child of an immigrant. 

Immigrants are also more likely to work jobs that have a job-multiplier effect, meaning that their employment facilitates the entry of other workers into the labour force. For example, workers in sectors like education and health services, where immigrants make up about 1 in 5 workers, help parents and caregivers of all backgrounds enter the labour force and grow the economy. This is particularly true for women, who perform a disproportionate share of unpaid care work.           

Immigrants tend to be younger, and with their high employment rates, they pay taxes into Social Security and Medicare with most not receiving benefits until many years in the future, if they are eligible at all. One study found that each foreign-born person pays on average $1,300 more each year and $237,000 more over their lifetime in taxes than they receive in benefits from federal, state, and local governments. Another showed that between 2012 and 2018, immigrants contributed $166 more per capita, on average, to the Medicare Trust Fund each year than what was spent on their behalf. Conversely, Medicare spent more on U.S.-born Americans than they contributed with an average cost of $51 per capita. Immigration can help preserve Social Security, while reforms to immigration policy could help extend Medicare solvency. Immigrants contribute to many social programs with their taxes, despite many being ineligible to receive most government benefits. In 2022, immigrants had a spending power of $1.6 trillion, and they collectively paid $579 billion in local, state, and federal taxes.  

President Trump’s mass deportation proposals will strip the United States of the many contributions of immigrants to the U.S. economy. Deporting immigrants will not only upend their lives, but also harm the U.S. economy through reduced economic growth, a smaller labour force, lost jobs, and higher costs to the detriment of all Americans. 

We have been there before! Malaysia under PM Abdullah Ahmad Badawi deported Indonesians and others in 2004/5. In 2005 alone, Malaysia deported 400,000 undocumented migrant workers as part of an enforcement campaign.  Our economy went into a “pause”. Badly affected were construction, agriculture, manufacturing and services. Diplomatic relations were strained while the harsh methods used affected public sentiment. The problem for us now is that when the U.S. is affected, it will impact us– but this time it is not our doing. 

Reference:

Mass deportations would deliver a catastrophic blow to the U.S. economy, Senator Martin Heinrich, Joint Economic Committee Democrats, 11 December 2024