The United States presents itself as the beacon of democracy. This is in contrast to the autocracies of China and Russia. Yet American democracy is in danger of succumbing to the same sort of oligarchic economics and populist nationalism in both these powers.
U.S. Republicans are busily suppressing votes of people of color and paving the way for a possible anti-democratic coup. The national Republican party excuses the attack on the Capitol – calling it “legitimate political discourse”. Representatives Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, are the only two congressional Republicans serving on the panel investigating that attack.
Source: https://www.anews.com
America’s oligarchic wealth, meanwhile, has reached levels rivaling or exceeding those of Russia and China. During the pandemic, America’s 745 billionaires increased their holdings by 70%, adding $2.1tn to their wealth in just over a year.
A portion of this wealth is going into politics. As early as 2012, more than 40% of all money spent in federal elections came from the wealthiest of the wealthiest – not the top 1% or even the top tenth of the 1%, but from the top 1% of the 1%. Peter Thiel, a staunch Trump supporter whose net worth is estimated by Forbes to be $2.6bn, has become one of the Republican party’s largest donors.
Last year, Thiel gave $10m each to the campaigns of two protégés – Blake Masters, who is running for the Senate from Arizona, and JD Vance, from Ohio. Thiel is also backing 12 House candidates, three of whom are running primary challenges to Republicans who voted to impeach Trump for the events of January 6.
The combination of oligarchic wealth and populist nationalism is dangerous for democratic institutions in the US and elsewhere. Capitalism is consistent with democracy only if democracy reduces the inequalities, insecurities, joblessness, and poverty that accompany unbridled profit-seeking.
For the first three decades after the second world war, democracy did this. The US and war-ravaged western Europe built the largest middle classes the world had ever seen.
The arrangement was far from perfect, but with the addition of civil rights and voting rights, subsidized healthcare (in the US, Medicare and Medicaid), and a vast expansion of public education, democracy was on the way to making capitalism work for the vast majority.
Then came a giant U-turn by Ronald Reagan in America and Margaret Thatcher in Europe. Deregulation, privatization, globalization, and the unleashing of finance created the Full Monty: abandoned factories and communities, stagnant wages, widening inequality, a shrinking middle class, political corruption and shredded social support.
The result has been widespread anger and cynicism. Even before the pandemic, most people were working harder than ever but couldn’t get ahead. Their children’s prospects weren’t any better. More than one out of every six American children was impoverished and the typical American family was living from paycheck to paycheck.
Starting last July, America did an experiment that might have limited these extremes and reduced the lure of nationalism. That’s when 36 million American families began receiving pandemic payments of up to $3,000 per child ($3,600 for each child under six).
But this successful experiment ended abruptly in December when Senator Joe Manchin joined 50 Republican senators in rejecting President Biden’s Build Back Better Act, which would have continued it.
They cited concerns over the experiment’s cost – an estimated $100bn per year, or $1.6tn over 10 years. The cost is also less than the increase in the wealth of America’s 745 billionaires during the pandemic. Why not a wealth tax?
The experiment died because the oligarchy didn’t want to pay for it.
Oligarchic economics coupled with populist nationalism marks the ultimate failure of progressive politics. When the people are no longer defended against the powerful, they look elsewhere for succour.
In Malaysia, the 10% taxpayers substantially foot the bill for Government’s expenditure. The rich (top 1%) in the same light as America have grown in number and wealth during this pandemic. Couldn’t we reform the tax system to make it more egalitarian and reduce inequalities in the system? Otherwise, we will continue to see our Gini coefficient remaining firmly fixed at 0.40.
Reference:
Beware of this deadly mix: oligarchic economics and racist, nationalist populism, Robert Reich, The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment