The Phillips curve (advanced by A.W. Phillips in 1958) is the inverse
relationship between inflation and unemployment – as unemployment decreases,
inflation increases.
In this graph, an economy can either experience 3% employment at the cost
of 6% inflation, or increase unemployment to 5% to bring down inflation level
to 2%.
Two researchers from USM (Chor Foon Tang, Hooi Hooi Lean), concluded in
their article in the Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies (Dec 2007) that for
the sample period of 1970 to 2005, the trade-off Phillips curve is “alive and
well in Malaysia”.
Fumitaka Furuoka (2007) of UMS in “Does the Phillips Curve Really Exist?
New Empirical Evidence from Malaysia”, Economics Bulletin, Vol 5, No. 16 pp
1-14, concluded that “there existed the cointegrating relationship – as well as
casual relationship between relationship between inflation rate and
unemployment rates in Malaysia”.
Nevertheless, the accuracy of the Phillips curve has been questioned by
many sane economists. It is probably nothing to do with the curve but the more
complex economy we face. Consumer credit at peak levels has flattened consumer
spending, causing a low inflation environment (but not deflation), decoupling
perhaps unemployment and interest rates. In Malaysia, with a decline in
disposable incomes as a result of high household debt levels inflation is tepid
at best. In an economy where technology has taken jobs and debt levels impact
inflation, there is more than the casual impact of inflation and unemployment.
Perhaps, a New Phillips Curve could be established.
For more information about Philips Curve, please visit http://www.mpcap.com.my/ or contact info@mpcap.com.my.