Friday, 13 October 2017

What’s My Budget for 2018?

At a pre-Halloween party, I was appointed the shadow Minister of Finance for a “virtual” nation. My job entails how to address the following:

·       Exchange rate depreciation;
·       Rising inflation for daily goods/services;
·       High fiscal debt;
·       High household debt;
·       Greater transparency and accountability;
·       Income inequality @ 0.40% Gini coefficient;
·       Enforcement of policies/laws;
·       Reducing corruption and enhancing integrity;
·       Providing unemployed graduates with jobs;
·       Reduce cost of doing business;
·       Getting value for investments in education;
·       Mounting health cost and surplus of medical professionals; and
·       Increasing productivity of civil service and private sector

These are some of the main concerns, amongst others.

As a technocrat, my new appointment makes life difficult because of competing forces in the political maelstrom! Be that as it may, I am determined to lay down my best for the “virtual” nation.

Many are troubled by exchange rate fluctuations. As an immediate step, the Overnight Policy Rate is raised by 1.0% to improve the exchange rate.  We need to reward savers as much as investors. There will be an outcry by those in business who see this as a cost increase which may impact GDP growth. We will take that challenge. Imported inflation is reduced, currency is better reflective of our standing, and people have confidence going forward. Creeping deprecation is like being in a haunted house with “creepy” ghosts.

For 2018 and 2019, we are reducing GST to 3%. Thereafter, we will re-examine consumption, inflation and tax buoyancy. This will stimulate growth, increase consumption and reduce inflationary pressures.

Our fiscal debt which is high, will first rise to 60% of GDP before reducing to a manageable 40% by 2020 and beyond. Legislative exemption will be sought for the increase. An additional 5% or $50 billion will be injected into the economy as a stimulus to build new district hospitals, TVETs (in education) and social services. Graduates in medical, education, social sciences are to be engaged for better services to the rakyat.

Our students in public universities will have their tuition fees waived for their respective courses. This is an investment in the country’s long-term future.

Household debts and the broad property sector have been a “drag” on the economy. I propose that both these areas are centralised under a new agency with the Central Bank as the custodian. Commercial banks have to “sell” to this agency their portfolios in the broad property sector to generate liquidity and lend fresh money for affordable housing. Each state will establish new housing development agencies for the middle and lower income strata. Affordable house cost will not exceed six times the average earnings of a household.

Private sector remuneration at the top end will not exceed 20 times that of the lowest employee in an organisation. The “excess” wage will be taxed at a higher rate of 30%. Inequalities have to be addressed if societies are not destabilised. With many large corporations having pre-tax profits in excess of $1 billion, it may be timely for wages of the lower level employees be raised. Tax rate will be reduced to 20% for those companies improving salary scales in excess of 10% but below 15% for 2018.

A new Corruption and Reconciliation Commission is proposed to provide an avenue for those involved in such practices. This Commission is to function for a period of three years, after which it will focus on integrity in private and public sectors.

Graduate unemployment has to be tackled at source. In the short term, a period of internship with companies is proposed. These companies will receive double tax relief for every graduate employed from the registered pool of unemployed graduates. Job centres/placement centres are to be established in every major city. In the longer term, graduate intake at university level must reflect demand conditions in the economy. A major review of courses will be implemented at university and college levels. Schools will be permitted to use English as a medium of instruction from Form 3. This is an option and will improve marketability of graduates.

To enhance productivity and provide innovation, an R&D Fund of $10 billion for application research is to be established.


To drive down health costs, generic drugs and production of the same will be encouraged. In the short-term, import of these drugs will be tax free (including GST). This will hopefully bring down costs. For the ageing population (above 65), all medical costs are borne by the Government. Purchase of medical devices such as walkers, wheelchairs, beds for assisted living are reimbursed on a one-time basis for each senior citizen.

To help reduce global greenhouse effect, we will refocus our energy sources to renewables. A special renewable fund scheme will be announced shortly to increase usage of solar and other sources of renewable energy. All gasoline driven cars will be banned in 2035 to reduce pollution in cities. Subsidies will be introduced for electric and hybrid vehicles.

Growth is driven by the private sector, and to enhance their ability to move forward, a structure similar to that at Central level is to be instituted at each state. The Government’s job is to facilitate. And this has to be in an efficient manner.

Our focus for 2018 and beyond is GDP growth of 6% and above. This together with an enhanced quality of life for the ordinary person. It is a right for everyone to own a home, a car and a business or have a stable income stream. We want this “virtual” nation to live up to its name, and truly reflect unity in diversity.

Finally, this is not a trick or treat event!

(The above is a figment of unbridled imagination (or the lack of it) of the writer. It does not represent any nation in the past, present or future).



Friday, 6 October 2017

Stock Market Crash Indicator



From Tulip Mania (1637) to the Subprime Crisis (2008), each market crash has cost investors a huge fortune.  Inevitably, it also has led to a period of economic recession/ depression.  There are many theories that attempt to explain the causes of the crash but not many could predict the crash ex-ante timely.

Didier Sornette, Professor of the Chair of Entrepreneurial Risks, also a Physicist and an Earth Scientist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), has combined economic theory, behavioural finance and earth science physics, to create a model in predicting financial bubbles, namely log-periodic power law singularity (LPPLS).

The LPPLS model successfully predicted the 2008 Oil Bubble (Read more here), 2015 Shanghai Stock Market Crash (Read more here) and 2016 minor Bond Market Crash.  According to his September 2017 report (Read more here), there is a growing risk of fixed income bubble whereas the chances of an equity market crash is easing somewhat(See below chart).  However, the September report only covered up to August data, thus it did not factor in the September rally where S&P 500 surpassed 2500 level.





We love to wait for his October report to see where the equity market is heading!

Friday, 29 September 2017

Is the U.S. Stock Market Overvalued?

In March 2009, the S&P 500 bottomed at 666. Today it’s about 2,500, that’s a 275 percent increase over 8 years. This (U.S. stocks) bull run has been strong and long lasting. A Trump victory has given credence to the fact that there is “more room to run”. But is that true?

The total market cap (TMC) to GNP ratio, or the Buffett indicator, is “probably the best simple measure where valuations stand at any given moment”. The chart below is the current ratio of total market over GDP (proxy for GNP) and its historical range.



The ratio cannot be used to compare the valuation levels of different nations. Some are driven by large public listed companies, others by state-owned companies. Then there are differences in reporting, accounting rules, regulations and tax laws. Further, some suffer from low equity ownership. For example, India has only 4% of adult population who own stocks compared to 52% in the U.S.

Country
GDP ($Trillion)
Total Market/GDP Ratio (%)
Historical Min. (%)
Historical Max. (%)
Years of Data
19.25
134.9
35
149
47
12.43
48
41
662
27
4.55
150
56
361
33
3.69
53
13
58
27
2.65
92
52
182
27
2.6
124
47
201
45
2.46
68
40
158
20
2.16
15
10
45
17
1.97
48
26
106
20
1.72
121
78
190
27

That said, the U.S. current market cap/GDP ratio of over 135 per cent could be problematic, if you subscribe to Buffett’s mantra. As he (Buffett) says, “for investors to gain wealth... the percentage relationship line... must keep going up and up”. And if it gets too high, Buffett says you’re “playing with fire”.

The cyclical-adjusted-price-to-earnings (CAPE) ratio of a stock is another standard metric used to evaluate if a market is overvalued or otherwise. This metric was developed by Robert Shiller of Yale and popularised during the Dotcom Bubble. It’s a variant of the typical price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of stocks.

When the CAPE ratio is high, it’s usually wise to reduce equity exposure.

CAPE Ratio S&P 500



The CAPE and Market Cap/GDP ratio generally correlate closely.

So is the U.S. market overvalued?

Robert Shiller suggests long-term investors to cut back on their equity holdings. At this level, he suggests that “the expected return for stocks might be negative, but only slightly so”. Shiller adds, “... it’s quite reasonable to have an investment in U.S. stocks as part of a diversified portfolio... but don’t go overboard on it”.

Thursday, 21 September 2017

How Do We Measure Income Inequality?

The Gini coefficient is a commonly used measure of income inequality. It condenses entire income distribution for countries into a single number between 0 and 1 – the higher the number, the greater the degree of income inequality.


The level of inequality differs widely around the world. Usually, emerging economies are more unequal than rich ones. Scandinavian countries have the lowest income disparities, with a Gini coefficient of around 0.26. The most unequal, like South Africa, registers around 0.67. The U.K. has a figure of around 0.36 while the U.S. is around 0.48.



Malaysia’s Gini coefficient according to the Economic Planning Unit, has improved to an all-time low of 0.40 in 2014.



This contradicts United Nations Human Development report that suggests the richest 10% control over 38% of income compared to poorest 10% who only have 1.7%. The World Bank puts Malaysia’s 2014 Gini coefficient at 0.421, higher than the Government’s calculation. Data discrepancies aside, how do we address inequalities?


  • First, by reducing wage gaps, where the CEO of a major public listed company earns RM3.0 million (or more) and a fresh graduate earns only RM48,000 per annum;
  • Second, improving social assistance for the poor so as to generate new income streams or create opportunities for re-education or upskilling; and
  • Third, effective cash transfers or credit vouchers that meet daily needs of food, transport and shelter. Social and para-social organisations have long been involved in easing the burden of the poor.

Affordable quality education, fair wages and opportunities for entrepreneurship may help the next generation of Malaysians to reduce income disparities faced currently.

For more information about Gini coefficient, please visit http://www.mpcap.com.my/ or contact info@mpcap.com.my.


Friday, 15 September 2017

Project Ranking Methodology for Public Infrastructure Project

Global estimates of infrastructure investments required to support economic growth and human development lie in the range of US$65-70 trillion by 2030 (Read more here), while the estimated pool of available funds is limited to approximately US$45 trillion (Read more here).

Conventional project finance ranking methodology using Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and/ or Payback Period (PBP) are straight forward and common among corporate practitioners as these methodologies seek to maximize shareholder’s wealth.

Public infrastructure projects, on the other hand, require more than maximizing shareholder’s wealth.  Other factors such as social and economic impact are equally important for decision making.  Furthermore, they often show an opposite impact as compared to financial results.

The World Bank has proposed an Infrastructure Prioritization Framework (IPF) in 2016 (Read more here).  It has a multi-criteria decision support tool that considers project outcomes along two dimensions, social-environmental and financial-economic.  Illustration below shows the summary and outcome of the IPF.



The core idea of the IPF is the statistical process, which consists of data Z-score standardization, normalization, and then using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method to assign weightage to each component to form the index.  PCA is an advanced statistical method recommended by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to assign weightage for Index construction (Read more here).

The above framework is useful to examine HSR, ECRL, MRT and other similar transport projects that will have an impact on the economy.

Example of Transport-Projects Ranked.


Based on the above, project 2 is a great project although its IRR is not high while projects 1 and 5 are to be rejected under this methodology.  Whilst projects 3 and 4 are deemed acceptable on the FEI and SEI indices.

For more information about project ranking methodology, please visit http://www.mpcap.com.my/ or contact info@mpcap.com.my.   

Friday, 8 September 2017

Is It Always NPV vs IRR?


                                         Picture source: capitalbudgetingtechniques.com



To measure the returns of a project, many use NPV and/or IRR. But which tool is better?




Safe to depend on NPV method for project selection. Generally used by financial analysts in DCF valuations to find present value of free cash flows to firm.

For more information about NPV vs IRR, please visit http://www.mpcap.com.my/ or contact info@mpcap.com.my.


Wednesday, 30 August 2017

Is There a New Phillips Curve for Malaysia?

The Phillips curve (advanced by A.W. Phillips in 1958) is the inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment – as unemployment decreases, inflation increases.


In this graph, an economy can either experience 3% employment at the cost of 6% inflation, or increase unemployment to 5% to bring down inflation level to 2%.

Two researchers from USM (Chor Foon Tang, Hooi Hooi Lean), concluded in their article in the Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies (Dec 2007) that for the sample period of 1970 to 2005, the trade-off Phillips curve is “alive and well in Malaysia”.

Fumitaka Furuoka (2007) of UMS in “Does the Phillips Curve Really Exist? New Empirical Evidence from Malaysia”, Economics Bulletin, Vol 5, No. 16 pp 1-14, concluded that “there existed the cointegrating relationship – as well as casual relationship between relationship between inflation rate and unemployment rates in Malaysia”.


Nevertheless, the accuracy of the Phillips curve has been questioned by many sane economists. It is probably nothing to do with the curve but the more complex economy we face. Consumer credit at peak levels has flattened consumer spending, causing a low inflation environment (but not deflation), decoupling perhaps unemployment and interest rates. In Malaysia, with a decline in disposable incomes as a result of high household debt levels inflation is tepid at best. In an economy where technology has taken jobs and debt levels impact inflation, there is more than the casual impact of inflation and unemployment. Perhaps, a New Phillips Curve could be established.


For more information about Philips Curve, please visit http://www.mpcap.com.my/ or contact info@mpcap.com.my.