MY MPCA
Corporate Finance, Project Finance, Investment.
Friday, 20 March 2026
Thursday, 19 March 2026
From Iran to I-ran!
On Feb 28, 2026, Tehran was rocked by an attack by the US-Israeli joint forces, targeting key military facilities and the Iranian leadership. The Iranians did not respond immediately. We have now entered into the third week.
Markets have reacted. The most profound moves seen in the price of oil, which has jumped by more than 50%. The United States has used multiple reasons to justify its action, but these are seen as more of excuses than valid reasons.
Source: https://ms.wikipedia.org
Among the many excuses used by the United States was that Iran was just two weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon. This is in the world of fantasy. In June 2025 the United States said Iran’s nuclear infrastructure was obliterated.
Another reason for the United States to strike Iran was that the president had a “good feeling” that Iran was going to strike Israel, hence, a pre-emptive strike. US President Donald Trump himself said that the reason for the strike in Iran was to facilitate regime change. Guess what? Iran has just appointed another Supreme Leader by the same surname.
Like Venezuela, the key objective is again economics, and the economics here is nothing but oil. Iran has the world’s third-largest proven oil reserves with just over 200 billion barrels of oil and is presently the world’s fourth-largest producer of oil at about 3.5 million to four million barrels per day. More importantly, Iran has some 12% of global oil reserves.
Iran’s geographical position is also of significance as it controls the Strait of Hormuz, where some 20% of global oil is transported. It is the sole sea passage from the Gulf region to the rest of the world.
Since Trump
came to power just over 14 months ago, the United States has been involved in
multiple conflicts. And he is the Chairman of the Board of Peace. The United
States has been involved in at least eight attacks since Trump took office in
January 2025. So much for peace!
The war in Iran costs US$1bil per day, and for a nation with US$38 trillion in debt, any war is a costly affair. The elevated oil prices will be damaging to the United States in the form of higher consumer prices, lower stock prices and potentially higher US Federal Reserve rates to contain inflation.
The United
States and Israel have three choices when it comes to ending this war:
(i) The United
States recognises the newly elected Supreme Leader and works with Iran to reach
an amicable solution with respect to Iran’s nuclear programme (if any).
(ii)
The United
States withdraws its military assets from combat positions.
(iii) The United States sends its ground troops into combat while the Iranians continue to attack US assets in the region, drawing other Middle East countries into an endless war. This is the worst option for all and is damaging for capital markets and asset prices.
Trump’s best option is to retreat gracefully, or in other words, from declaring war on Iran to running away from it. In short, from “Iran to I-ran”.
Reference:
Does the world need another war?, Pankaj C. Kumar, The Star, 14 Mar 2026
Wednesday, 18 March 2026
Is Malaysia Resilient With the Current Oil Shock?
Brent ended last week
at USD92.69/bbl, but the more relevant issue is whether disruption in the
Strait of Hormuz persists long enough to keep oil in a higher range for months
rather than weeks. Under that path, Kenanga Research’s duration simulation
lifts the implied 2026 Brent average to about USD94.8/bbl. In their view, that
is the key macro threshold. The longer oil stays elevated, the greater the risk
that the shock broadens from energy into freight, food, distribution and
inflation expectations.
For Malaysia, Kenanga
thinks the commodity cushion is real, but not large enough to neutralise a
persistent external oil shock. Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM)’s decision to keep
the overnight policy rate at 2.75% suggests policymakers are still prepared to
look through the first-round move, but that comfort narrows if higher fuel and
logistics costs begin feeding more visibly into broader prices.
Malaysia will remain
relatively resilient, supported at the margin by domestic demand and
terms-of-trade gains, but still exposed to tighter financial conditions and
wider second-round inflation pressure if disruption persists.
Domestic demand has
held up well, the external sector still has commodity support, and BNM has not
signalled any need to react to energy volatility in isolation. Growth has
remained resilient in recent years, with forecast still pointing to 4.6% in
2026.
References:
Malaysia resilient
but not immune to prolonged oil shock, says Kenanga, CS Ming, Focus Malaysia, 9 March
2026
Tuesday, 17 March 2026
Living Under One Roof!
Multi-generational living used to focus on ageing parents. Today, developers are designing homes for a different reality. They are thinking about working adult children who need their own space, privacy and independence without leaving home. This change is subtle, but it reflects a broader shift in both culture and economics.
For many
Malaysian families, the adult child who moved back during the pandemic or never
left at all has become a long-term fixture in the household. What started as a
temporary arrangement has quietly reshaped how many families live.
Malaysia’s population is gradually ageing. In 2025, the country’s median age rose to 31.3 years, up from 30.9 in 2024, reflecting an overall shift towards an older demographic. According to the Statistics Department, the working-class population aged 15 to 64 years made up 70.4% of the total, marking a slight increase from 70.2% in 2024. The share of Malaysians aged 65 and above rose to 8% in 2025 compared to 7.6%, a year earlier. At the same time, the proportion of children aged zero to 14 declined to 21.6%, compared with 22.2% in 2024. These shifts are clearer when viewed through dependency ratios which measure how many children and elderly people are supported by every 100 working-age individuals.
The total dependency ratio eased slightly to 42.1 in 2025 from 42.5 in 2024. The decline was mainly due to fewer children, as the youth dependency ratio fell to 30.7 from 31.6. However, the old-age dependency ratio rose to 11.4 from 10.9, highlighting the growing number of elderly Malaysians. Overall, the data points to a gradual demographic shift, with fewer young people and more seniors shaping the country’s future. But demographics alone do not explain what is happening in Malaysia’s housing market.
Developers are responding to real-life pressures on families, from the cost of urban living to cultural expectations and financial realities. Homes are being redesigned to accommodate adult children who stay at home longer than previous generations, balancing independence with shared family life. Across urban townships and high-rise projects, subtle changes are emerging. More developers are introducing dual entrances, so one part of a home can function almost as a self-contained unit. Others include lockable studio spaces or extra master bedrooms that allow adult children to have their own privacy while remaining under the same roof. Splitting utilities and separating meters make it easier for families to manage expenses independently. These features do not exactly get marketed as homes for adult children. They are described as flexible layouts, rental-friendly spaces or multi-generational designs. But the conventional is shifting because developers have been paying attention to how Malaysians are living now.
Overall, the economic pressures are real. Urban property prices continue to rise faster than wages in many cities, making independent living increasingly difficult. Renting or buying a small apartment can be expensive and commuting adds both time and cost. For many young Malaysians, staying with family becomes the most viable option and developers are adapting their designs accordingly.
Financially,
households are pooling resources to manage costs more efficiently. Culturally,
staying at home longer is increasingly seen as practical rather than a failure
to leave the nest.
Whether this trend will persist depends on multiple factors. If wages grow and housing affordability improves, younger adults may once again seek independent living earlier. If economic pressures continue or if caregiving needs expand with an ageing population, multi-generational living may become the default rather than the exception.
Reference:
All under one roof, Samantha Wong, The Star, 1 March 2026
Monday, 16 March 2026
Is it from Glory to Gutter?
There were seven players involved in the national football scandal. They were not “heritage” nor naturalised players. Neither of their grandparents were born in Malaysia. They have been found guilty.
Fifa sanctioned the Football Association of
Malaysia (FAM) and the seven players on Sept 26 last year. From the moment the
scandal broke, FAM officials chose clouding over accountability. They attempted
to cloak the fact that fraudulent documents - including birth certificates -
were used to clear these seven players to don the Harimau Malaya jersey in the
Asian Cup qualifiers. Through the National Registration Department (NRD) and
Home Minister, whose ministry oversees it, the government’s role is already a
matter of public record.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org
When the scandal broke, a declaration dated Sept 19, 2025 made by NRD director-general Badrul Hisham Alias, and submitted to Fifa as a defence statement, stated that the players provided the required documents with the names and identification details of their grandparents.
Three bodies - the Fifa Disciplinary Committee, Fifa Appeals Committee, and the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS) have called NRD’s bluff or mistake - there is no such lineage. So, what has NRD got to say?
Now, on top of legal fees, FAM must swallow its
pride and send 350,000 Swiss Francs to Fifa - the fine for its open defiance. Malaysians
need to know the full extent of this rot.
Malaysians deserve answers, not silence. We deserve the names, the documents, and the accountability that have been so artfully dodged. This saga has never really been about football. It is about a culture of impunity. If our leaders cannot answer for how public funds were used to forge public documents, then they are not just silent partners in this scandal - but complicit in the cover-up.
The fiasco affects football, our relationships with FIFA, AFC and the nations we play football with. The “Magnificent Seven” was the theme song for the movie by the same name. In the movie, the seven were “heroes”, here they are all made to look like villains. And the moral of the story is our citizenship could be processed in weeks if you can play football but decades if you can’t.
To clean this up, we need a new FAM structure with all Malaysians in it and a respectable President, not a politician or any from the royalty. We need programmes from schools graduating into FAM’s “wings”. We need exposure of players in overseas football leagues. We need a blueprint on the “Road to World Cup” (could be a 10-year plan). And many more, but most of all integrity in our words and actions.
Reference:
Comment: From glory
to gutter: Football’s bitter truth deserves to be told, R Nadeswaran, Malaysiakini, 9
March 2026
Friday, 13 March 2026
Why Are More Malaysian Children Getting Stunted?
It is
embarrassing that the problem of stunting in our children must be highlighted
by international data organisations before it gains more attention locally.
Stunting has worsened in children in Malaysia for the past 15–20 years. We have
had good national data from the national health and morbidity surveys to show
that stunting in children under five years has increased from 16.6% in 2011 to
21.8% in 2022.
The World
Health Organization (WHO) currently estimates that the stunting rate of
children in Malaysia has increased to 24%. Stunting rates in much of the world
are coming down. But ours is worsening. Countries poorer than us – Laos,
Cambodia and Bangladesh – are doing better with a decline in stunting rates. We
have now reached a childhood stunting rate close to that of Bangladesh. As a
comparison, the 2024 childhood stunting rates in Singapore and South Korea were
less than 3%.
The main
reason for stunting among children in Malaysia is due to a lack of food
security, i.e. a lack of adequate nutrition in childhood, as well as nutrition
issues in pregnancy. Stunting is not something that happens just after you are
born. It often happens before you are born.
The 2022
national survey data show a fairly high anaemic rate among pregnant women – a
sign of nutrition issues and a major risk for low birth weight and stunting in
the newborn. Data shows that stunting was higher among Sarawak and Sabah
natives, and those with household incomes of less than RM1,000. Due to a lack
of disaggregated data, Orang Asli children may have stunting rates of between
60% and 70%.
Stunting
rates for children in detention, refugees, stateless people and migrants could
be serious. All this points to poverty as a major factor for stunting. Over 1.2
million children are living in poverty in our country. In addition, we have
many children who are eating enough calories to feel full, but are lacking
essential nutrients – protein, iron, calcium and Vitamin D – required for brain
and height growth.
Recent
Southeast Asian nutrition surveys and Malaysia’s own 2024 health and morbidity
survey show that 50% of Malaysian children do not eat a diverse diet, lacking a
sufficient intake of fruits, vegetables and dairy.
Stunting is
not primarily a medical problem or a failure of parenting. It is a failure of
the many governments we have had in the past 20 years to act effectively in the
face of good, national data showing that the problem has worsened. Right now,
one in four children is stunted. The implications of this are staggering. The
most tragic aspect of this crisis is its permanence – a window that closes
forever.
We cannot
continue with ‘business as usual’. The fact that past plans have failed means
that current plans may not work. We must address the lack of accountability of
government ministries and agencies tasked with stunting prevention. The
critical window for preventing stunting is the first 1,000 days – from
conception to a child’s second birthday. This must be our focus.
If we are
serious about dealing with stunting in our children, we need a national
bipartisan committee with all stakeholders involved. This committee needs
strong civil society involvement and should be chaired by the prime minister.
Stunting
steals a child’s future possibilities before they even have a chance to realise
them. We cannot afford to let another generation grow up in the shadow of what
they could have been. The impact of a 24% childhood stunting rate will harm the
nation for decades into the future.
Reference:
Why are
more Malaysian children getting stunted while neighbours reverse the trend?
Amar-Singh
HSS, ALIRAN, 7 Feb 2026
Thursday, 12 March 2026
Why Do We Discard Experience?
Something
painful is quietly happening in our workforce today, and many of us pretend not
to see it. A man turns 50. He is not tired, broken or incapable. In fact, he
may be at his sharpest, having survived recessions, corporate politics,
leadership changes, market crashes and digital transitions. He has seen
projects fail and rise again. He knows where money leaks, where risks hide, and
where egos destroy value. But the moment he updates his CV, something changes.
Suddenly, he is ‘expensive’, ‘overqualified’ or ‘not aligned with company
direction’. And if we are brutally honest, sometimes he is simply ‘too old’.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org
We see job
advertisements demanding 10 years’ experience but offering salaries that barely
justify the responsibility. We see four roles merged into one title. We see
cost optimisation replacing value optimisation. The irony, of course, is that
in some fields, experience is still worshipped. Some lawyers with 25 years in
court become more valuable, not less. Their experience compounds, and their
clients trust them more deeply with time.
Many senior
doctors are not viewed as ‘costly’ – patients will willingly wait months to
consult them because experience, in that field, is directly linked to
confidence and life-or-death decisions.
Yet in many
corporate environments, the same experience is reduced to payroll weight –
until a crisis hits, a system fails or skills shortage emerges. And suddenly,
we are looking around saying, “We need the oldies.”
An
uncomfortable truth keeps surfacing: we are losing experienced teachers faster
than we can replace them. Over 19,000 teachers in Malaysia opted for early
retirement between 2022 and May 2025, according to the deputy education
minister.
Experts and
education advocates have proposed bringing retired teachers back as part of the
solution. It is not hard to understand why. Classroom management is not theory.
Discipline is not learned from a PowerPoint slide. Teaching is not just content
delivery – it is character formation.
Think of a
retired teacher in her late 50s who has taught three generations in the same
town. She knows family backgrounds and understands behavioural patterns. She
can manage a classroom with a look, and her students still greet her years
later with genuine respect. That is not just teaching skill. That is
accumulated social capital. And when the system struggles, we are reminded, too
late, of what we gave away.
Policymakers,
human resources leaders and government-linked companies need to rethink the
design. That means incentives for hiring senior professionals, flexible
structures for advisory and mentoring roles, and structured integration
programmes. This is not charity but the strategic retention of human capital.
If we can accept that retired teachers are needed to help stabilise education,
then we must accept the larger truth too. Experience is not a liability but a
national asset. The real question is whether we are wise enough to build
systems that value it – before we are forced to rescue it.
Reference:
Why we
discard experience – and then scramble to get it back, Amarjeet
Singh, Aliran 26 Feb 2026








