Thursday 30 June 2022

Can One Retire With EPF Contributions?

A survey conducted by the Social Wellbeing Research Centre (SWRC) of Universiti Malaya found that more urban EPF members made withdrawals via the i-Lestari and i-Sinar schemes than those from rural backgrounds.

In the survey, which saw 2,000 respondents, 31.8 percent earned within RM1,001 to RM2,000, 18 percent earned less than RM1,000, and 23.9 percent had no income.

Among the respondents, 84.6 percent and 76.8 percent who withdrew from i-Lestari and i-Sinar respectively used their funds for daily expenses, while 46.1 percent and 55.5 percent used it for loan repayments, such as for cars, housing, and credit cards.

A significant proportion of respondents, 35.4 percent and 40 percent, also used the money to fund their children’s education during the movement control order (MCO), while 32.7 percent and 34.8 percent used it to pay their house rent.


Source: https://ms.wikipedia.org



A similar survey conducted by the UCSI Poll Research Centre reported 32 percent of 809 respondents who withdrew from the i-Sinar scheme, spent the money on home repairs or minor renovations.

While there are legitimate needs for the withdrawal, there have also been instances of financially questionable decisions. An example of this includes a man in Terengganu who reportedly used RM1,080 of his RM5,000 i-Sinar withdrawal to install 11 speed bumps outside his house, claiming his sleep was often disturbed by vehicle noise.

After an estimated RM110 billion was withdrawn in the two years from the fund’s Covid-19 related measures, savings among EPF members in the fund have been set back by almost 10 years.

It was reported in late 2021 that 6.1 million people, which is half of EPF members, have less than RM10,000 in their accounts, of which 2.6 million have less than RM1,000.

To add to this, Malaysia is on the cusp of becoming an ageing society, with over 5 million of the population expected to be over 60 years old by 2030. This is also the minimum retirement age of civil servants, which impacts heavily the large pensioner population upon retirement.

The EPF’s target of RM240,000 needed for retirement is mainly a projected figure and may vary based on the cost of living in different cities and by different household categories.

According to research done by Universiti Malaya, a single senior citizen who lives in the Klang Valley area is estimated to have higher monthly expenses of RM2,490. This is compared to people in Alor Setar, Kedah who require less - approximately RM1,990.

Citizens may also be forced to take into account the gradual decline in health during those years, with chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes being the most common among Malaysian adults. 

To rebuild the EPF’s loss is to subscribe to voluntary additional contributions capped at RM60,000 per year, or increase monthly contribution rates above 11 percent to speed up the replenishment of funds. However, Khazanah Research Institute revealed that from the total active EPF members of 7.6 million in 2019, registered members in voluntary schemes made up only 2.7 percent or roughly 200,000 members.

According to the Malaysia Ageing and Retirement Survey (MARS) 2018 that was conducted by Universiti Malaya, 81 percent of respondents (1.59 million individuals) preferred to continue working even after their retirement.

Economists have called for a universal pension scheme to overcome the adverse effects from EPF’s previous withdrawal schemes. The proposed system could be funded by grants from the government, income from public investments, and contribution schemes.

Khazanah Research Institute recommended a social insurance pension as an alternative. This would involve compulsory monthly contributions of RM53 for at least 36 years to receive a monthly annuity equivalent to the future value of the poverty line per capita for a lifetime starting from the age of 60.

Of the above two proposals, a universal pension scheme through EPF is the better option. Government may need to “top up” with grants or other contributions from GLCs and/or Petronas. That’s the only credible way forward but don’t hold your breath. This Government is bankrupt of courage and idea.

Reference:
Do you have enough for retirement? Let’s find out, Raveena Nagotra, https://newslab.malaysiakini.com, 


Wednesday 29 June 2022

Government Makes U-turns!

Putrajaya has rescinded its decision to remove the ceiling price for chicken effective July 2022. Also, the electricity surcharge has been deferred to December 2022. This came after inflation concerns were raised. A free float of chicken and chicken egg prices will escalate cost of living. So does electricity surcharges.

The ceiling prices for chicken and chicken eggs were implemented on Feb 5 and subsequently extended to June 30. Currently, the ceiling price for standard chicken is set at RM8.90 per kg in Peninsular Malaysia.

Ismail Sabri also announced that the government has decided not to increase the water and electricity tariffs in Peninsular Malaysia.

There will be a rebate of two sen/kWh for domestic consumers in the peninsula while a minimum surcharge of 3.70 sen/kWh for commercial and industrial consumers will remain unchanged. The government was reportedly due to review the electricity tariff, which is due on July 1.

Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) was pressured by the rising generation cost due to a combination of surging energy demand, fuel supply disruptions, as well as the growing shortages of oil, gas, and coal globally, which have caused global energy prices to skyrocket.

At the end of last year, the price of coal surged to US$200 (RM846) per tonne, up from around US$50 per tonne in mid-2020; by the end of May 2022, coal prices had risen to US$434 per tonne, with coal accounting for 59 percent of Malaysia’s key source of electricity generation.

TNB Fuel Services sources coal from Indonesia, Australia, South Africa, and Russia, but Indonesia accounts for approximately 65 percent of TNB’s coal requirements.

Why must TNB raise tariffs? Its pre-tax profit for the first quarter of 2022 was RM0.9 billion. Annualise that, it works out to over RM3.6 billion for the year. Assuming further escalation of cost, profit could be reduced to RM2 billion. Is that too “small”? If TNB raises tariffs because analysts expect that, it will only make management look good. Could TNB reduce costs especially if the management group earns over RM 11m a year? A rise in tariff is a rise in inflation for most items. And the poor can hardly afford that! U-turns are most welcome in this case.


Source: https://commons.wikimedia.org

References:

Govt makes U-turn on chicken ceiling price, new one to be revealed soon, Malaysiakini, June 24, 2022

Consumers to pay more for electricity due to steep rise in fuel cost, Isabelle Leong (www.thevibes.com), 15 June 2022

Electricity tariff hike: 7% increase for some, targeted subsidy for others, Isabelle Leong, The Vibes, 17 June 2022

 


Tuesday 28 June 2022

War “Business”: Who Benefits?

The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been widely condemned for its unjustified aggression. Less discussed is the almost half trillion-dollar (£381 billion) defence industry supplying the weapons to both sides, and the substantial profits it makes as a result.

The EU announced it would buy and deliver €450 million (£375 million) of arms to the Ukraine. The US has pledged US$350 million in military aid in addition to the over 90 tons of military supplies and US$650 million in 2021.

The US and Nato sent 17,000 anti-tank weapons and 2,000 Stinger anti-aircraft missiles. An international coalition of nations is also willingly arming the Ukrainian resistance, including the UK, Australia, Turkey and Canada.

This is a major boost for the world’s largest defence contractors. Raytheon makes the Stinger missiles, and jointly with Lockheed Martin makes the Javelin anti-tank missiles. Both US groups, Lockheed and Raytheon shares were up by around 16% and 3% respectively since the invasion.

BAE Systems, the largest player in the UK and Europe, is up 26%. Of the world’s top five contractors by revenue, only Boeing has dropped, due to its exposure to airlines among other reasons.





The overall industry is global in scope. The US is easily the world leader, with 37% of all arms sales from 2016-20. Next comes Russia with 20%, followed by France (8%), Germany (6%) and China (5%).

Beyond the top five exporters are also many other potential beneficiaries in this war. Turkey defied Russian warnings and insisted on supplying Ukraine with weapons including hi-tech drones. Israel enjoys around 3% of global sales. 

As for Russia, it has been building up its own industry as a response to western sanctions. The government instituted a massive import substitution programme to reduce its reliance on foreign weaponry and expertise, as well as to increase foreign sales.

 As the second biggest arms exporter, Russia has targeted a range of international clients. Its arms exports did fall 22% between 2016-2020, but this was mainly due to a 53% reduction in sales to India. At the same time, it dramatically enhanced its sales to countries such as China, Algeria and Egypt.

The largest Russian defence firms are the missile manufacturer Almaz-Antey (sales volume US$6.6 billion), United Aircraft Corp (US$4.6 billion) and United Shipbuilding Corp (US$4.5 billion).

What the west and Russia share is a profound military industrial complex. They both rely on, enable and are influenced by their massive weapons industries. This has been reinforced by newer hi-tech offensive capabilities from drones to sophisticated AI-guided autonomous weapons systems.

Wars can be avoided. Most wars are about dominance. A human trait that can be “controlled”. No dictator or murderer will live forever. What’s it all about? Ego, greed and/or covetousness. We need more “peace studies” than war and defence colleges. As a human civilisation we seem not to have progressed from Genghis Khan or Alexander the Great. We have the United Nations because of WW2. But it has remained a eunuch in most situations. Unless we have peace, a nation will ruin its coffers and face an end to its dominance. Ask the Romans, the Brits, the French, Dutch or Portuguese. Now the U.S. is repeating that cycle. The only people who will benefit are the arms suppliers and dealers. Is that the human goal? To self-destruct for the benefit of Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop, BAE Systems etc?




Reference:
Ukraine: the world’s defence giants are quietly making billions form the war, The Conversation, 9 March 2022

Monday 27 June 2022

Is Sarawak Really Strong?

On June 18, 2022, Francis Paul Siah wrote in Malaysiakini on the topic “Weak Putrajaya versus stable strong Sarawak”.

He claimed in his article Putrajaya and Sarawak are poles apart on stability and strength. He took the changes in PMs at Federal. Sarawak, on the other hand, Abang Jo is the “perpetual” leader or is he? Gabungan Parti Sarawk (GPS) has been in power for ages and will continue to do so with Abang Jo.

According to Francis, Sarawakians are happy and satisfied with the GPS government. Putrajaya on the other hand, is on autopilot, rudderless and aimless! You cannot go on autopilot and say you are aimless! Autopilot by its definition means there is a predetermined destination which does not require a pilot’s intervention.



Souce: https://www.theborneopost.com



Abang Jo is riding high, according to the article. He has been working hard and now is the Premier of Sarawak not the Chief Minister. His only drawback is corruption at all levels which needs to be addressed. And Francis makes a tearful appeal to Abang Jo to work on it. Does he not know of the Sarawak Report and the shenanigans of the “white haired” Rajah of Sarawak? Or has he lost touch of the timber tycoons and others who support the White-haired Rajah?

Sarawak had a great chance to change Malaysia for good, after the Sheraton move. Abang Jo could have been the Premier of Malaysia instead of just Sarawak. Yes, money from Sarawak had developed Putrajaya and the Klang Valley instead of Limbang and Lawas. Why couldn’t Abang Jo see a paradigm shift in the making? He could have implemented MA63, changed the civil service, culture, use of English and many others! Was he not “man enough” to take on the challenge with PH or was he blocked by Anwar?


Reference:
Comment: Weak Putrajaya versus stable, strong Sarawak, Francis Paul Siah, 18 June 2022, Malaysiakini

Friday 24 June 2022

RAM Ratings (“RAM”): Do We Need Another Storm?

The independence and credibility of RAM Holdings is in question following the green light from the Securities Commission (SC) for the acquisition of the credit rating firm by CTOS Digital Bhd.




CTOS Digital, which is linked to Creador, a multibillion private equity firm owned by Brahmal Vasudevan, was given approval by the SC to acquire a more than 51% stake in RAM. RAM was established by Bank Negara Malaysia in 1990 to support the local debt capital market.

RAM is the industry leader in credit ratings. Its credit opinions have become a crucial reference for banks as well as financial regulators. RAM’s constitution bars any individual stakeholder from owning more than 20% of shares in the company. But this can be overcome - RAM’s recent AGM has already approved it.

CTOS currently holds 11.52% paid-up capital in RAM, which will be increased to 19.25% “pending completion of administrative steps”, according to a request from CTOS.

Some pointed out the “gradual subversion of RAM” over the years, saying non-banking as well as foreign entities were among more than a dozen shareholders in the agency. Adding to the fear is the potential conflict of interest of individuals in CTOS.

Why is BNM exceptionally quiet on this? And why is the SC favourable to the move? RAM can become a tool for some individual interests and how will CTOS ensure its independence and reduced conflicts of interest? How are employees treated? Who gains in this transaction? The banks? BNM? SC? Why can’t we have an independent adviser’s opinion and recommendation on price and other issues?

Reference:
Storm brewing in Malaysian debt capital market as new entity set to take control of RAM rating agency, Malaysia Now, 3 June 2022

Thursday 23 June 2022

Do Malaysians Want Alcohol, Gambling Nightclubs Banned?

A few so-called religious experts have advised Muslims in the country not to participate in the forthcoming Japanese ‘dancefest’ Bon Odori. Besides the proposed smoking and vaping ban announced by Health Minister Khairy Jamaluddin, an online survey conducted by a Muslim consumer group has asked for the Government to ban alcohol, gambling, bars, nightclubs, karaoke joints and the sale of sugary beverages.

The online survey by the Muslim Consumer Association of Malaysia, (PPIM) collated input from 1,259 respondents to gauge the views of the general public on negative habits apart from smoking and vaping for future generations. However, PPIM did not divulge the background of its respondents – probably all Muslims! It found that 89% of the respondents want the Government to ban alcohol while 69% want the Government to ban the sales of sugary beverages.

The survey also found that 86% of the respondents want the Government to ban gambling, while 79% want the Government to impose a ban on nightclubs, karaoke joints and pubs.




Are we on the road to a Taliban state? The survey is most probably skewed. And how can they propose a lifestyle that only meets a section of the population? Every single item, gambling, alcohol, cigarettes, vaping, karaoke joints, nightclubs, sugary drinks (esp. syrup bandung) could go “underground” and cause more problems. But these Taliban-style measures will create jobs for the Moral Police Force (to be formed under JAKIM?). At a time when Saudi Arabia with Mohammed bin Salman is trying to reform, we are in a retro show! Could we not focus on more beneficial stuff like inflation, economy and productivity? Or is that too much to ask?

Reference:
Survey: “Most M’sians want alcohol, gambling, nightclubs banned”, Bernie Yeo, 8 June 2022, Focus Malaysia

Wednesday 22 June 2022

Is GST Better Than SST?

The World Bank Group lead economist for Malaysia Dr Apurva Sanghi said on Monday (June 13) the goods and services tax (GST) is better than the sales and service tax (SST) because the GST broadens a country's tax base and brings in more revenue.

More than 170 countries around the world have adopted some kind of VAT (value added tax)/GST system, and that's one reason why the GST is more efficient than the SST. On the flip side, GST is regressive because it is a tax on consumption and 60% of the economy depends on consumption.  GST may also increase compliance costs for businesses such as small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

Looking back, Malaysia announced a GST of 6% beginning April 1, 2015 before the SST scheme was re-implemented in the country on Sept 1, 2018 to replace the GST.





On June 8, Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz said the Ministry of Finance is looking at introducing the Fiscal Responsibility Act by tabling the bill at the Malaysian Parliament’s next session — scheduled to start on July 18 — to boost tax collection, which will be crucial to replenish the nation's coffers to finance the nation’s developmental and longer-term reform plans.

Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) views it (GST) as a move to shift the tax burden from the rich to the poor. Under the neo-liberal ideology, the wealthy will always find ways to pass the burden of financing the nation to the poorer segment of the society. Why not wealth tax, inheritance tax, transaction tax, capitals gains tax and forex tax for the top 1%?

Even if we disregard PSM, there is almost a consensus view that GST is regressive. So, why do we consider it? Because our tax revenue from this indirect tax is doubled from RM20-25 billion to RM40-45 billion (with GST). But what are the pre-conditions for GST? Two conditions come to mind:

  1. the nation is considered a developed state not a developing one;
  2. the Gini coefficient is 0.30 or below – that’s a measure of relative inequality in a society. We are at 0.4 which is far from the desired outcome. Why is this so? Because the rich 1% (or up to 10%) will not allow for any new taxes that they will have to bear. It is always the ordinary rakyat who must shoulder the burden.

If the above conditions are not met, GST is a tax on the poor and the middle income while the rich may happily agree to it. Can’t we learn from history not to repeat mistakes?

References:
GST better than SST – World Bank, Syafiqah Salim, TheEdge CEO Morning Brief, 14 June 2022

When in crisis, tax the poor instead of the rich; PSM scoffs at Tengku Zafrul, G. Vinod, Focus Malaysia, 9 June 2022

GST better than SST, says expert, Farah Adilla, 3 May 2018, New Straits Times 

Tuesday 21 June 2022

Of Gini, Lorenz and Palma for Measuring Inequality

Although Gini, Lorenz and Palma sound like names of pretty women, they are tools for measuring inequality. Inequality in a country is often measured using the Gini coefficient, which shows the share of total wealth or income by population segment. A higher Gini coefficient indicates greater inequality, with high-income individuals receiving much larger percentages of the total income of the population. Critics of the Gini argue that it is an imperfect measure as it ignores the informal economy and flattens distortions in the income distribution, leading to non-intuitive interpretations. The Palma ratio is another way to measure inequality, better weights observed income distributions using a simple and easy-to-understand ratio.

For years, the number used to measure inequality has been the Gini coefficient. 0 denotes perfect equality, in which everyone's income—or occasionally, wealth—is the same; 1 denotes perfect inequality, in which a single individual makes all the income (figures above 1 could theoretically result if some people make negative incomes).

If you plot population percentiles by income on the horizontal axis against cumulative income on the vertical axis, you get something called the Lorenz curve. In the graph below, we can see that the 54th percentile corresponded to 13.98% of total income in Haiti and 22.53% in Bolivia. In other words, the bottom 54% of the population took in around 14% of Haiti's income and around 23% of Bolivia's. The straight-line states the obvious: in a perfectly equal society, the bottom 54% would take in 54% of the total income.







In a hypothetical society in which the top 10% of the population earns 25% of the total income, and so does the bottom 40%. You get a Gini coefficient of 0.225.
Now, if you cut the bottom 40%'s income by two-thirds—to 8.3% of the nation's total income—and give the difference to the top 10%, who now earn 41.7% (the amount earned by the 40%-90% chunk stays steady). The Gini coefficient nearly doubles to 0.475. But if the bottom 40%'s income falls by another 45%, to just 4.6% of the total, and all of that lost income again goes to the top 10%, the Gini coefficient doesn't rise much—it's now just 0.532.
Roughly speaking, a Gini ratio of about 0.5 and above is deemed as a highly unequal society while those with Gini ratio of below 0.30 as a more equal society. We (Malaysia) have been stuck at 0.4 for years.
Two economists Alex Cobham (now chief executive of the U.K's Tax Justice Network) and Andy Sumner (now professor of international development at King’s College London and director of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Global Challenges Strategic Research Network on Global Poverty and Inequality Dynamics), viewed the Gini just didn’t make much sense. 
In 2013, Cobham and Sumner proposed an alternative to the Gini coefficient: the Palma ratio. They named it after José Gabriel Palma, a Chilean economist. Palma noticed that in most countries, the middle class—defined as those in the fifth to ninth income deciles, or the 40%-90%—take in around half of the total income.

The Palma ratio is calculated by dividing the richest 10% of the population's share of gross national income (GNI) by the poorest 40%'s share.
The rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer is the main driver of inequality. The Gini, however, is more sensitive to changes in the middle group, which is where shifts in income less frequently occur. The Palma was developed to remedy this issue by focusing on the differences between those in the top and bottom income brackets. The higher the Palma ratio, the greater the inequality. 
In a sense, inequality is not just about income and wealth but of opportunities. Where people lack opportunities to better themselves, they will end up with lower incomes and wealth. And how do we measure inequality of opportunities? That’s for another day!

References:
Measuring inequality: Forget Gini, Go with Palma Ration instead, David Floyd, Feb 28, 2022 (https://www.investopedia.com)

What is a Lorenz Curve? Eric Estevez, (https://www.investopedia.com)


Monday 20 June 2022

Maglev System for Putrajaya?

Transport minister Dr Wee Ka Siong recently received a courtesy visit from representatives from the South Korean rail industry. Among them were EP Korea Railway and Maglev MKC. During the meeting, the minister was briefed on plans for a maglev train system for Putrajaya. The briefing was presented by EP Korea Railway’s senior managing director, Yoo Jai Tark. The minister also said that the Ministry of Transport will be holding further discussions with the Ministry of Federal Territories “soon” on developing the train system for the Putrajaya area. There will apparently be an emphasis on the way it will integrate with the other transportation systems already in the area.


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org

Maglev train systems make use of magnetic levitation. This tech conveys a number of benefits compared to traditional rail systems - key among which are the lowered maintenance cost due to having less moving parts. In turn, this potentially leads to better energy efficiency at higher speeds due to not having to deal with rolling resistance. This also leads to faster acceleration and deceleration, as well as emitting less noise associated with either process.

On the flip side, construction costs for maglev track are generally exorbitant. 

Maglev trains run at speeds of 430km/h or more, but there are also low speed systems that cost approximately USD100 million per km to build.

Why do we stop at Maglev? Shouldn’t we look at hyperloop – which theoretically costs lower than Maglev? And why Putrajaya? Is waiting time in traffic jams for ten minutes in the morning and evening too much for civil servants? Or, is this a show-case of a modern city? Silly ideas from some demented folks, especially when the average family is suffering from inflation, cost of living and fixed income.

References:

Transport Ministry in talks with Korean train maker to build Maglev system in Putrajaya, Ian Chee, www.lowyet.net, 14 June 2022

Comparison of conventional high speed railway, maglev and hyperloop transportation systems, Mehmet Nedim Yavuz and Zubeyde Ozturk (www.dergipark.org.tr)



Friday 17 June 2022

Comparing Different Schools of Economics

Like some religious order, Economics has generally nine different schools of thought and a brief scope of them is shown below:



The Neoclassical/Austrian school has been instrumental in promoting “free” markets; minimal government regulation and privatisation of national assets. This is the legacy of the Reagan era. Now largely discredited with the 2008 meltdown. But many are still heavily focussed on econometric model building that has little to do with reality.

For developing economies, the developmentalist is most suited and there is a great need for more research and findings on issues, challenges and solutions for developing countries. Neoclassical school reigned supreme over last 40 years with abstract models and views.

Reference:

9 Schools Of Economics Explained On A One-Page Cheat Sheet, Tyler Durden, Zero Hedge (https://www.businessinsider.com)


Thursday 16 June 2022

Why U.K. Needs the Oligarchs?

“Dirty” Russian money has polluted British democracy. The Conservatives have taken donations from Vladimir Putin’s friends without asking enough questions about where the cash is coming from. Londongrad is the home of the oligarchs.

Russian money is just a part of an annual flow of foreign finance that enables Britain to run permanent and massive trade deficits, where imports of goods and services are higher than exports. 


Source: https://www.aa.com.tr

There was a time – many decades ago – when Britain’s trade deficits were a big deal. Politicians used to worry about them. They were front-page news. A bad set of trade figures was supposed to have cost Labour the 1970 general election. But since the early 1980s, Britain’s trade deficit has got bigger and the worry is less. Why? Many of the leading football clubs have foreign owners. Many of the utility companies are no longer in British hands. That helps balance of payments.

The Government’s pink book provides an in-depth account of Britain’s balance of payments, which divides things up into a current account – which includes imports and exports of goods such as cars and computers, and trade in services such as banking or management consultancy – and a financial account that simply measures flows of money itself in and out of the country.

Countries such as the UK that run permanent trade deficits have to sell assets to foreign buyers to raise the cash to balance the books. Over time, Britain has run a cumulative trade deficit in goods and services of £1.3tn. But in the pink book (a government explanatory book) that outflow has been matched by financial surpluses – cash – of the same amount. Money from selling British assets to foreign buyers balances the “books”.

But oligarch money was also part of this process. Russians who had got rich from the privatisation of state-owned assets during the 1990s found a home for their money in the London property market. Financially, this was a smart move for them. Russian money – like Middle Eastern oil money – has also found its way into the Premier League. For those football fans wondering why their club used to be owned by local businessmen in the 1970s but is now in the hands of foreign owners, the pink book has the answer.

Mark Carney, when he was governor of the Bank of England, said the UK relied on the kindness of strangers to finance its trade deficit and he was quite right. But many of these strangers were pretty dodgy characters.

For decades Britons have consumed more than they have produced. And over the past 40 years the economy’s centre of gravity has shifted from manufacturing to financial and business services, centred on the City. London’s role as one of the world’s financial hubs has made it easy to attract foreign capital.

So while making life as awkward as possible for Putin’s cronies might be a moral necessity given what is happening in Ukraine, two issues need to be addressed. The first is whether the UK should hand back any sequestered assets to any Russian people from whom they were stolen. The second is that even if London ceases to be the destination of choice for mafia bosses and drug dealers, a means will have to be found to balance the books.

This can only be done in a number of ways. The UK can strengthen its manufacturing sector so that goods exports go up. It can do even better in those parts of the service sector where it already performs well, such as management consultancy, financial services and architecture. If it does neither of these things, the import bill can be cut by consuming less. Or Britain continue as before and accept that large chunks of prime London real estate will forever remain in foreign ownership.

For Malaysia, trade deficits are not the issue. We have surpluses on our trade account. But services section (of the balance of payment) is where we struggle, especially trade (transportation and remittances). To offset, we could strengthen those import items that could be manufactured or cultivated (agriculture) here. And do we have a plan for that?

Reference:
Why are oligarchs so necessary in Britain? Because we love living beyond our means, Larry Elliot, The Guardian, 10 March 2022 (https://www.theguardian.com)

Wednesday 15 June 2022

The Kondratiev Wave

In economics, Kondratiev waves (also called supercycles, great surges, long waves, K-waves or the long economic cycle) are hypothesized cycle-like phenomena in the modern world economy. The phenomenon is closely connected with the technology life cycle.

It is stated that the period of a wave ranges from forty to sixty years, the cycles consist of alternating intervals of high sectoral growth and intervals of relatively slow growth.

Long wave theory is not accepted by most academic economists. Among economists who accept it, there is a lack of agreement about both the cause of the waves and the start and end years of particular waves. Among critics of the theory, the consensus is that it involves recognizing patterns that may not exist.

The Soviet economist Nikolai Kondratiev (also written Kondratieff or Kondratyev) was the first to bring these observations to international attention in his book The Major Economic Cycles (1925) alongside other works written in the same decade. In 1939, Joseph Schumpeter suggested naming the cycles "Kondratieff waves" in his honor. The underlying idea is closely linked to organic composition of capital.

Two Dutch economists, Jacob van Gelderen and Salomon de Wolff, had previously argued for the existence of 50- to 60-year cycles in 1913 and 1924, respectively.

Since the inception of the theory, various studies have expanded the range of possible cycles, finding longer or shorter cycles in the data. Ray Dalio in his book “The Changing World Order” speaks of this cycle.

Kondratiev identified three phases in the cycle, namely expansion, stagnation and recession. More common today is the division into four periods with a turning point (collapse) between expansion and stagnation.

Writing in the 1920s, Kondratiev proposed to apply the theory to the 19th century:

  • 1790–1849, with a turning point in 1815.
  • 1850–1896, with a turning point in 1873.
  • Kondratiev supposed that in 1896 a new cycle had started.



A rough schematic drawing showing growth cycles in the world economy over time according to the Kondratiev theory


The long cycle supposedly affects all sectors of an economy. Kondratiev focused on prices and interest rates, seeing the ascendant phase as characterized by an increase in prices and low interest rates while the other phase consists of a decrease in prices and high interest rates. Subsequent analysis concentrated on output.

When inequity is low and opportunity is easily available, peaceful, moral decisions are preferred and Aristotle's "Good Life" is possible (Americans call the good life "the American Dream"). Opportunity created the simple inspiration and genius of the Mayflower Compact, for example. Post-World War II and the post-California gold rush 1850s exemplify times of great opportunity and low inequity, and both resulted in unprecedented technological and industrial advances. On the other hand, 1893's global economic panics were not met with sufficient wealth-distributing government policies internationally, and a dozen major revolutions resulted, which some argue were significant causes of World War I. Few would argue against the assertion that World War II began in response to the economic strictures of World War I's Treaty of Versailles and the failure to create government policy that supported economic opportunity during the Great Depression.

According to the innovation theory, these waves arise from the bunching of basic innovations that launch technological revolutions that in turn create leading industrial or commercial sectors. Kondratiev's ideas were taken up by Joseph Schumpeter in the 1930s. The theory hypothesized the existence of very long-run macroeconomic and price cycles, originally estimated to last 50–54 years.

In essence, Ray Dalio speaks of similar cycles which explain the rise and fall of empires. The transition of one cycle to another is probably 20-30 years. And we are likely in that transition.

Reference:

Kondratiev Wave, Wikipedia



Tuesday 14 June 2022

What is the ‘Great Replacement’ Theory?

The “great replacement” theory, in simple terms, states that positive immigration policies are part of a plot designed to undermine or “replace” the political power and culture of white people living in Western countries.

Antecedents and precursors to the “great replacement” theory have always been present. Recognizing this broader history, we can trace the replacement theory’s modern use from French nationalist authors to fringe alt-right xenophobes. In 1973, the French author Jean Raspail wrote a novel titled The Camp of the Saints, an apocalyptic tale that attempts to depict the destruction of white, Western society at the hands of mass immigration from the Global South.  In 2012, Renaud Camus, another Frenchman heavily influenced by Raspail, authored a book titled The Great Replacement. In the book, Camus argues that white Europeans “are being reverse colonized by Black and Brown immigrants.

Throughout the 2010s, the term — and the theory — slowly began to catch hold among fringe right and white supremacist figures. As asylum-seeking migrants sought refuge in southern Europe and then on the U.S.-Mexico border, the theory began to emerge from more mainstream sources.



Source: https://edition.cnn.com



Evil, hate and violence have sprung directly from the “great replacement” theory. 

On Aug. 11, 2017, hundreds of individuals representing anti-semitic and white supremacist groups including the Ku Klux Klan gathered for the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, a two-day event that sparked extreme violence and led to the death of a counterprotester. The extremists kicked off the rally by referencing the “great replacement” theory, chanting “You will not replace us” and “Jews will not replace us.” 

On Oct. 27, 2018, 11 congregants in a Pittsburgh synagogue were killed in one of the deadliest attacks against the Jewish community in the U.S. The shooter’s belief in the “great replacement” theory precipitated the attack, as he believed that HIAS, a Jewish American nonprofit organization that provides aid and assistance to refugees, was working to “bring invaders in that kill our people.” 

On March 15, 2019, 51 people were killed in consecutive terrorist attacks on mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. The shooter’s manifesto repeatedly and directly referenced replacement theory. Its title was The Great Replacement.
 
On Aug. 3, 2019, 23 people were killed in a mass shooting at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas. The terrorist targeted Latino shoppers, and his manifesto referenced the “great replacement” theory and fears of a “Hispanic invasion of Texas.” The manifesto also listed the Christchurch shooter as an inspiration. How is the ‘Great Replacement’ Theory Being Used Today? 

Tucker Carlson (Fox News Network) has explicitly touted the “great replacement” theory on his broadcast multiple times. He referenced it directly for the first time on an April 8 episode of Tucker Carlson Tonight, and then again on Sept. 22. Other political figures on the right and far-right have also brazenly endorsed the theory.

When faced with a dark and extreme ideology like this, it can feel overwhelming and like it’s impossible to make a difference. However, we have the power to educate ourselves and be catalysts for change.

Learn more about its history. Help others understand where statements and theories like these originate. Share this resource and talk with your loved ones and friends. Amplify the voices of those who have spoken out against theories like these.

As Martin Luther King Jr. said “darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that”.

Reference: 
The “Great Replacement” Theory, Explained, National Immigration Forum

Monday 13 June 2022

Do Subsidies Distort the Economy?

The 2022 Economic Report estimated the expenditure for subsidies and social assistance in 2022 (excluding measures announced during the tabling of the budget) at RM17.35 billion. This is up from RM16.7 billion in 2021. Fuel has long been a subsidised commodity in Malaysia, but it was only in early March, the first time since 2008 that the government agreed to subsidise poultry players. According to the Minister of Finance subsidies may total RM 71 billion in 2022 with fuel subsidies alone amounting to RM 30 billion.

Crude oil prices have been climbing. Since last December, Brent crude gained 32% to US$91.38 per barrel similar to levels last seen in 2014. For 2021, crude oil prices hovered at US$51.80 per barrel and US$85 per barrel, averaging US$70 per barrel.


Source: https://www.malaymail.com


Analysts predict that crude oil prices will continue to trend higher, surpassing US$100 per barrel. Two main events have resulted in a steep rise in crude oil, the first being increased demand on global economic rebound and the other is the geopolitical tension between Russia and Ukraine.

While crude oil prices have risen dramatically, consumers in Malaysia have continued to enjoy retail fuel prices that have remained unchanged for 11 months now. Since February 2021, the price of RON95 and diesel has been capped at RM2.05 per litre and RM2.15 per litre respectively.


The RM17.35 billion “subsidy and social assistance” estimated for 2022, includes cash handouts, a cooking oil stabilisation scheme, education assistance and scholarships, interest rate subsidies, electricity subsidies, paddy plantation subsidies, flour subsidies, LPG subsidies as well as farmer, fisherman and livestock incentives.

According to a recent statement by Finance Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz, spending on fuel subsidies may reach RM28bil this year if global oil prices continue to trend above US$100 (RM422) per barrel.

Will fuel subsidy work? In its present form, and in the short term, yes, at least from the perspective of alleviating the financial pain of B40 and M40 groups. In the long term, no, because it will put pressure on the government’s fiscal position. Subsidies give a false impression and eventually result in violence like in Sri Lanka. There is a need to “wean-off” subsidies, otherwise we have a poor fiscal position and a false sense of comfort. This is one distortion we can live without it!

References:
The rising subsidy bill quandary and its implications, Supriya Surendran and Esther Lee, The Edge Malaysia, 3 March 2022

Will targeted fuel subsidies work? Firdaos Rosli, The Star, 9 April 2022


Friday 10 June 2022

Global Statshot: Online financial services

Connected devices can play in delivering financial empowerment, while simultaneously challenging stereotypes of who’s using online banking today. More than half (52.1 percent) of South Africa’s working-age internet users say that they have interacted with a banking, investment, or insurance website or app in the past 30 days, which is significantly higher than the equivalent figures for the United States (38.4 percent) and the United Kingdom (41.1 percent).




For context, internet penetration in South Africa currently sits at 70 percent, compared with 92 percent in the USA, and 98 percent in the UK.

But South Africa isn’t the only “developing” economy where the level of adoption of online financial services is higher than it is in the world’s largest economy.

At 45.5 percent of working-age internet users, Brazil also sees relatively high rates of online banking adoption, as does Malaysia (44.1 percent).

Various factors may contribute to these differences, but one of the clear takeaways from this data is that – provided the necessary infrastructure is in place and relevant services are available – a country’s economic standing isn’t the only determinant of whether its citizens will embrace online financial services. 

However, perhaps surprisingly, older internet users are considerably more likely to use online banking, investment, and insurance services than younger users are.

Once again, there may be various reasons for these differences, but these findings provide valuable reference and context for policymakers hoping to address issues relating to financial empowerment.




Turning to more innovative financial products, it’s interesting to note that people in developing economies are considerably more likely to have embraced crypto currencies than their peers in more economically developed countries are.

Overall, GWI reports that 1 in 9 working-age internet users around the world now owns some form of “crypto”, but this figure jumps to almost 1 in 4 in Turkey.





The rapid decline in the value of Turkey’s fiat currency over recent months likely played an important role in this trend, and may help to explain why ownership of crypto in Turkey has jumped by roughly 28 percent in just the past 3 months.

However, cryptocurrencies are also increasingly popular across South-East Asia, with more than 1 in 5 working age internet users in the Philippines (22.7 percent) and Thailand (20.3 percent) saying that they now own some form of crypto.

Ownership of digital currencies is significantly skewed towards male internet users though, with GWI’s data indicating that – at a global level – men are almost 60 percent more likely to own crypto than women are.




Reference:

Digital 2022 Global Overview Report, Global Statshot, DataReportal/We Are Social/Hootsuite, Simon Kemp, 21 April 2022


Thursday 9 June 2022

Changes: What are Demographics and its Implications?

Malaysia’s total population was 32.4 million in 2020 compared to 27.5 million in 2010. Of the 2020 population figure, 9.1 million were in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya. (This is according to National Census 2020).

Selangor recorded the highest population with 6.9 million, followed by Johor (4 million) and Sabah (3.4 million). Meanwhile, the lowest population was recorded in Labuan, which amounted to 95.1 thousand followed by Putrajaya 109 thousand.



 Source: http://personal.psu.edu

The population in four administrative districts exceeded one million, namely Petaling (2.3 million), Ulu Langat (1.4 million), and Klang (1.1 million persons) in Selangor and Johor Bahru (1.7 million).

The percentage of bumiputera increased to 69.4 percent in 2020 compared to 55.8 percent in 1970. The composition of Chinese Malaysians decreased to 23.2 percent from 34.1 percent in the same period while Indian Malaysians decreased from nine percent to 6.7 percent.

According to the 2020 data, bumiputera was the main ethnic group in all states except Penang. Ethnic Chinese amounted to 44.9 percent in Penang while bumiputera 44.7 percent.
Those with the highest number of bumiputera were Putrajaya (97.9 percent), Terengganu (97.6 percent) and Kelantan (96.6 percent).

Apart from Penang, the second highest with regard to Chinese composition was Kuala Lumpur (41.6 percent), followed by Johor (32.8 percent). 

The composition of Indians was the highest in Negeri Sembilan (14.3 percent), Perak (11.5 percent) and Selangor (11.3 percent). These states may still have private sector vibrancy in the economic sphere.

The implications of the above are both political and economic. The “ketuanan” issue may become less relevant with drop of Nons in the country. The economic ramification in general is that GDP growth, going forward, could be lower – for two reasons: less private sector initiative and lower investments by Nons. However, Government/public sector initiatives and domestic consumption may reduce the “gap”.

Selangor, especially Klang Valley and Johor Bahru remain significant “catchment” areas for private enterprise. More detailed analysis may provide particular towns and cities in Selangor that have the potential for more housing, retail and other services and education establishments.

The National Census is a good base to chart policies and plans for both public and private sectors.

Reference:
Census 2020: M’sia heading towards an ageing society, Ooi Choon Nam, https://newslab.malaysiakini.com 

Wednesday 8 June 2022

Are Cash Trusts in Malaysia Ponzi Schemes?

The Association of Trust Companies Malaysia, together with Life Insurance Association of Malaysia, Malaysian Financial Planning Council and the Financial Planning Association of Malaysia, among others, are unhappy with development of cash trust (this was as reported by TheEdge).

Their key complaints are centred on extremely high returns promised by these trusts and other outfits with similar modus operandi. Many suspect this could be a Ponzi scheme. Some of these companies are said to offer returns of as high as 36% per annum. 


Source:https://coingeek.com


In contrast, the fixed deposit rate of Malaysia’s largest bank by market capitalisation, Malayan Banking Bhd (Maybank), is 2.1% for a 12-month tenure, and 2.35% for five years. And in FY2021, Maybank paid out 58 sen per share in dividends, which, while considered very high, translates to a yield of 7%. 

A Ponzi scheme — named after Charles Ponzi who operated a fraudulent system in the 1920’s — is an investment where depositors are promised a very high rate of return, with seemingly low or zero risk. The money ploughed in by new depositors is then used to pay returns to the earlier investors. The entire exercise snowballs until it is no longer sustainable. Trust company is then wound up, and the depositors lose their money. Some of the more famous Ponzi schemes of recent times include that of the late Bernard (Bernie) Madoff, who was sentenced to 150 years in prison for financial fraud in 2009. He was supposed to have US$65 billion in assets under management, but there was actually very little left.

A cash trust is created when a sum of cash is placed in a trust, and the beneficiary or beneficiaries can tap on to the cash trust for emergencies, including for legal expenditure while waiting for an insurance payout, or pending an inheritance claim. A unique feature of a cash trust, it states, is that it will not be frozen upon the cash trust creator’s death, and that cash in the trust is still accessible subject to terms and conditions. The company in question also claims to have more than RM2.5 billion in assets under trusts, and that it has been operating for more than 30 years. 

Another company with a similar business model promises payouts of 12% per annum but requires a minimum placement of RM250,000. However, it is not clear if the company’s subsidiaries were profit making even to sustain such a payout. It is understood that this company changed auditors three times in four years. According to TheEdge, source familiar with the cash trusts operations said that in some cases, companies operating such schemes are well connected. That makes them more brazen.

Malaysians are ‘creative’ people. The former PM and J. Low showed the way to global recognition. Now we have others who operate with impunity. The core problem is returns for fixed/savings deposits. It is low or negligible (esp. savings deposits). So greed will set in to try to secure returns from other ‘credible’ schemes. In addition, regulatory authorities are conveniently by-passed or have no jurisdiction over their operations. Also, some political masters provide ‘cover’ for such schemes. When will we learn? Until integrity, honesty and accountability are a by-word in our lives!

Reference:
Several cash trusts said to be Ponzi scheme, TheEdge CEO Morning Brief, 24 May 2022

Tuesday 7 June 2022

Is Malaysia Heading Towards An Ageing Society?

 Based on National Census 2020 revealed that the population percentage of senior citizens aged 65 and above has increased significantly in the past two decades. It now stands at 6.8 percent or 2.2 million in 2020 compared to 3.9 percent in 2000.


According to the United Nations standards, a country or region is defined as an ageing society if those aged 65 and above are between seven and 14 percent of the entire population.


Source: https://www.un.org

At the state and federal territories level, four were considered ageing states with the percentage of senior citizens aged 65 and above exceeding seven percent of the local population. Perak topped the list with 8.95 percent, followed by Kedah (7.91 percent), Perlis (7.86 percent) and Sarawak (7.53 percent). Putrajaya, on the other hand, is the “youngest” with 1.41 percent of senior citizens aged 65 and above. The second is Labuan (4.2 percent). Understandable for Putrajaya to be “youngest”, as those retiring will move elsewhere to spend their twilight years!

The situation is in line with the decline in the growth rate. Malaysia's population grew at a slower rate of 1.7 percent a year from 2010 to 2020 compared to 2.2 percent a year between 2000 and 2010.

Most of the states recorded lower growth rates over the last decade compared to between 2000 and 2010. Perlis, Kelantan, Negeri Sembilan, Kuala Lumpur and Johor, however, recorded a higher growth rate.

Three states registered an average population growth rate of below one percent over the last decade, namely Sarawak 0.2 percent, Perak 0.8 percent and Sabah 0.9 percent.
The highest annual growth rate from 2010 to 2020 was in Putrajaya at 4.8 percent and Selangor  (2.7 percent).

With the fertility rate declining, the average household size decreased from 4.3 to 3.9 over the last decade.

In 2020, Kelantan recorded the highest average household size with 4.9 persons per household followed by Sabah (4.7 persons) and Terengganu (4.1 persons). Meanwhile, Kuala Lumpur recorded the lowest at 3.5 persons.

The above have implications on economic focus – there is need for good retirement villages like in Florida or Australia. Retirement age may need to be raised to 65. Lifestyle and wellness programs could be helpful for seniors. Food, drugs and medical requirements could be areas that companies could avail themselves. And better regulations and guidelines required for those running retirement homes and helpers working in those homes. Cases of abuse are hardly reported because many have dementia or family members just overlook them. The whole area of age and age-related needs begs for a masterplan.

Reference:

Census 2020: M’sia heading towards an ageing society, Ooi Choon Nam, https://newslab.malaysiakini.com 




Friday 3 June 2022

Global Statshot:Internet Usage

The world’s population was 7.93 billion people Earth in April 2022, with 57 percent residing in urban areas. Mobile users now number 5.32 billion people, equating to 67 percent of the total global population. Smartphones account for roughly 4 in 5 of the mobile handsets in use today. Internet users number 5.00 billion people with the global total increasing by almost 200 million over the past year. Of this, 63 percent of the world’s population is now online, but there are still important differences in the “quality” of internet access around the world. There are 4.65 billion social media users around the world today, which equates to 58.7 percent of the total global population. However, if we focus just on ‘eligible’ audiences aged 13 and above, data suggests that roughly three-quarters of all those people who can use social media already do.




The journey only began about 50 years ago, with the first transmission of data via an internet-like network taking place in October 1969.

Email followed in the early 1970s, but it wasn’t until Tim Berners-Lee developed the World Wide Web some 20 years later that adoption of the internet really started to gain momentum.

When the first website went live in August 1991, fewer than 4 million people around the world used the internet, but internet users grew quickly over the following decade.



The global user total passed 50 million shortly after the removal of commercial internet restrictions in 1995, and by the turn of the millennium, well over a quarter-of-a-billion people were already online.

The billionth internet user likely came online sometime in 2005, but it only took another 6 years for that global user figure to double to 2 billion.

By early 2017, more than half of the world’s total population was using the internet.

These trends indicate that internet user growth rates have slowed in recent years, but that’s perhaps to be expected now that more than 6 in 10 people are online.

The latest data show that internet users have still increased by almost 200 million over the past 12 months though, representing year-on-year growth of slightly over 4 percent.





The latest wave of research from GlobalWebIndex (GWI) reveals that the world’s internet users now spend an average of 6 hours and 53 minutes online each day.

However, the latest figures mean that the world’s 5 billion internet users still spend a combined total of more than 2 trillion minutes online every single day.

For context, the typical internet user now spends more than 40 percent of their waking life online.

And what’s more, with the typical user spending more than 48 hours online each week, billions of people now spend more time using connected devices than they spend at work.



On average, younger people tend to spend more time online than older generations do, with young women spending the greatest amount of time using the internet.

GWI’s research reveals that women aged 16 to 24 now spend an average of 8 hours per day online, meaning that many women in this demographic now spend as much time using the internet as they do sleeping.

At the other end of the spectrum, men in the Baby Boomer generation say that they spend just under 5½ hours per day online, but that still equates to roughly a third of their waking hours.



Despite these impressive figures, however, there are still 2.9 billion who do not use the internet in April 2022, representing 37 percent of all the people on Earth.

Southern Asia is home to the largest offline population, with more than a third of the world’s “unconnected” living in the region. 744 million people remain offline in India, equating to more than half (53 percent) of the country’s population, and more than a quarter of the world’s unconnected. Meanwhile, 145 million people in Pakistan do not currently have internet access (63.7 percent of the population), and 114 million people remain offline in Bangladesh, equating to more than two-thirds of the country’s population (67.9 percent).



China still has a large unconnected population too, despite the country’s internet users now numbering well over 1 billion. Roughly 415 million people remain offline in China, equating to 28.7 percent of the country’s total population. For context, China’s offline population accounts for just over 14 percent of the world’s unconnected in April 2022.




Reference:
Digital 2022 Global Overview Report, Global Statshot, DataReportal/We Are Social/Hootsuite, Simon Kemp, 21 April 2022