Monday, 17 November 2025

The King Without a Tribe?

 

Every leader dream of being the chosen one! Anointed by destiny, embraced by his people, and immortalized by their faith. But sometimes, fate plays a cruel joke. Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Malaysia’s prime minister ascended the throne without the blessing of his own tribe — the Malays. 

In the 15th General Election (GE15), Anwar’s Pakatan Harapan (PH) secured only about 11% of Malay votes. Then came the state elections in six states (PRN 2023) — a political reality check — where 83% of Malay voters chose Perikatan Nasional (PN) instead. Even in his own bastion of Selangor, PN swept 22 state seats and bagged a staggering 73% of Malay support. Across Kedah, Kelantan, and Terengganu, PH and Barisan Nasional (BN) were trounced. The army, the police, Felda settlers — all overwhelmingly Malay, all turned away. 


Source: https://www.wikiwand.com

Anwar, the reformist prophet once cast into political exile, now finds himself crowned at last — only to discover that his kingdom does not believe in him. For decades, Anwar was the voice of Malay empowerment within UMNO, the man who could quote both Imam al-Ghazali and George Orwell in a single breath. But as the tides of identity politics hardened, his multiracial idealism became a liability, his reform agenda mistaken for betrayal. The Malays — his people — drifted toward the comfort of green flags and simpler certainties. 

There’s an old Malay proverb that says, “Harimau mati meninggalkan belang, manusia mati meninggalkan nama” — a tiger leaves its stripes, a man leaves his name. But what happens when a man’s name no longer resonates with his own kin? Anwar’s struggle is no longer about policy or performance; it’s about belonging. He is Malaysia’s first “untribed” prime minister — accepted by the minorities, tolerated by the elites, yet orphaned by the majority. He talks of Madani values — compassion, reform, inclusivity — but the people he most wishes to persuade hear only the echo of alien tongues. The political home he seeks — the Malay heartland — no longer waits at the shore with open arms. He must understand their concerns and insecurities, namely: 

-cost of living;

-housing;

-employment; and

-the NEP and its relevance or otherwise

And he doesn’t have much time to gain traction with his tribe without losing minority support. The good news for him is that the opposition is also imploding. 

To be fair, Anwar’s dilemma is not unique. Leaders from Mandela to Nehru, even Churchill, all wrestled with moments when their people turned skeptical. But in Malaysia’s fractious landscape, being a leader without the backing of your own tribe is like being a general without an army. 


Reference:

OPINION | The King Without a Tribe — Anwar’s Mythical Struggle for Acceptance, Mihar Dias, Newswav, 27 October 2025

Friday, 14 November 2025

“I’m Bringing Home Your Favourite Dish”

 

A food delivery rider in Kuala Lumpur had almost completed his job for the day and was excited to go back home and see his family, but unfortunately, fate had other plans. The rider collapsed by the road when delivering his last order, after telling his mum that he was coming home with her favourite dish. When the authorities checked his phone, they found his last message to his mum, telling the elderly about the meal plan with her favourite dish. “I am almost done with my work. I’m coming back home tonight with your favourite dish.”

 

Source: https://www.wikiimpact.com / The Rakyat Post

According to a viral Threads post, the mum and the son were staying at a low-cost flat (PPR) at that time, and the rider slept only three hours every day, working day and night just for one purpose. He was earning extra income to fund the treatment of his mother’s kidney disease. Despite his commitment, the post mentioned that the deceased rider never failed to contribute a little by donating to the mosque, as the family found a receipt for a RM10 donation to the mosque, which he never missed doing every week. It is also said that during his funeral, the neighbours and many other riders were present, and some shed their tears over the loss.  

Delivery riders work very hard, incentivised perhaps by their income (including tips). Do we appreciate them? Rain or shine, they deliver. And in most cases they are Malays. So, who says they don’t work hard? I am amazed at their dedication. 

I was blessed to work in a bumiputra environment with both bumis and non-bumis as my colleagues. And they worked equally hard. Its leadership and a reward mechanism that benefits all. When the institution failed to recognise their contribution, many left and I too left! No regrets. My colleagues attained high positions even as CEOs of major organisations. And I am pleased. In many cases, they follow the culture they are used to. 

The real issues are skirted by most politicians - cost of living and income inequalities. In small ways, we are changing even though politicians play their games! 

Reference:

“I’m bringing home your favourite dish” – KL Delivery Rider’s Final Text to His Mum Before Collapsing & Dying, Azri Azizan, World of Buzz, 6 November 2025

Thursday, 13 November 2025

Will Visit Malaysia 2026 be a Resounding Success?

 

The best measures of success for inbound tourism are arrival figures and tourism receipts. Arrivals are recorded at international checkpoints nationwide, where entries and exits can be by land, air or sea. 

Foreigners that arrived and exited the same day are termed excursionists, and those that stayed for at least one night in our country are tourists. Although all foreigners are welcome, visitors who stay longer naturally contribute more to our tourism receipts.

 

Source: https://www.malaysia.travel/page/visit-malaysia-2026

Take last year for example, 25 million foreign tourists spent RM102.2 bil in Malaysia, whereas 13 million foreign excursionists spent only RM4.5 bil. Combined, the 38 million foreign visitors contributed RM106.7 bil in 2024. 

So, what is the targeted number of visitor and tourist arrivals for Visit Malaysia 2026 (VM2026)? The numbers have kept changing, partly because reporters and editors kept interchanging visitors and tourists freely when reporting arrival figures, which is a grave error for technical terms with distinct definitions. 

Early this year on January 6 at the launch of VM2026 at Hangar 6 of MAB Engineering Complex in Sepang officiated by the Prime Minister, the target then was to welcome 35.6 million tourists and generate RM147.1 bil in tourism receipts. 

In April, Tourism Malaysia director-general Datuk Manoharan Periasamy said it is aiming for 45 million visitor arrivals. Later in September, Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the government is targeting 43 million foreign visitors this year and 47 million in 2026. 

The latest reported figures on ‘tourist’ arrivals to Malaysia is until August at 28,242,804, averaging 3,549,350 a month or 42,364,206 a year. Obviously, the figures are for visitor arrivals, not tourist arrivals as wrongly reported by a local English daily and carried by a Singapore newspaper. The ‘Visitor Performance to Malaysia’ posted by Tourism Malaysia is still until April. Until it is updated to August, the breakdown for visitor arrivals into tourists and excursionists is still unknown to the public. Likewise, there has been no disclosure on the number of foreign tourists and excursionists targeted for VM2026. 

Be that as it may, will VM2026 be a resounding success? Yes, hopefully, barring circumstances that are beyond our control, such as another pandemic, or war within the Asean region, or political upheaval in our country What other things could go wrong? The immigration officers’ lack of courtesy; the aerotrain breaks down; the airlines are not prepared for the influx; rude taxi drivers; translators in tour buses are incompetent; missing persons off Sabah; and a host of other things. So, try to sort those items we can control and leave the rest to fate or takdir? 

In the end, without connectivity, convenience, comfort and courtesy, natural attractions or man-made events, however good they may be, would not draw many other fellow human beings to Malaysia.

 

Reference:

Will Visit Malaysia 2026 be a resounding success? Well, yes but only if…, YS Chan, Focus Malaysia, 10 October 2025

Wednesday, 12 November 2025

2026: A Year of Restraint?

 

The World Bank has cautioned that 2026 may be “a year of restraint” for Malaysia, as slowing global and regional growth, weaker export demand and softer domestic consumption are expected to keep economic expansion flat. The projected real gross domestic product (GDP) growth for 2026 is 4.1%. This is the same pace forecasted for 2025. 

The Malaysian economy is highly sensitive to changes in the United States and China’s economies. A one percentage point (ppt) reduction in US growth reduces estimated growth in Malaysia by 0.8 ppt, and a one ppt decline in China’s growth reduces it by 0.45 ppt.

 

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org

Another moderating factor in 2026 is the unwinding of front-loading effects in exports, which are expected to be “flat at 2.9%”. Import growth is also likely to slow to 3.7% in 2026, down from 4.5% this year. 

Moreover, domestic demand – the main driver of growth in 2025 – is also slowing. Easing from 5.2% this year to 4.7% in 2026. The biggest contributor to domestic demand is private consumption, which is expected to slow from 5% this year to 4.9% in 2026. 

Firms are adopting a wait-and-see approach, either delaying or scaling back capital expenditures. The World Bank expects gross fixed capital formation – which is investment – to slow from 7.2% this year to 4.7% for 2026. 

Malaysia continues to grapple with tariff-related uncertainties. Measures to cushion industries affected by the US tariffs are the most pressing short-term priority. The bottom line is that almost 60% of Malaysian goods – by value – are exposed to the US market. Many of these products are now subject to a 19% tariff and are also exported by countries that enjoy lower tariff rates. Based on tariff differentials alone, Malaysia seems more likely to lose its overall share in the US export market. 

Dr Apurva, the lead economist of the World Bank highlighted that the electrical and electronics (E&E) industry – the country’s “golden goose” – is particularly at risk, despite current tariff exemptions. He noted that Malaysia has the highest exposure among Asean countries like the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam to potential future US tariffs on E&E exports. Another source of uncertainty is the rules of origin. Policies on transshipments and origin rules have yet to be clarified. About 12% of Malaysia’s E&E value-added is tied to Chinese E&E exports. 

The second structural risk is inadequate research and development (R&D). The median R&D-to-sales ratio in Malaysia is much lower than China and Taiwan. The third structural risk is low indigenous innovation. Only 13% to 18% of patents granted by the Malaysian Patent Office went to Malaysian residents. 

He noted the country’s revenue has been on a decline from 2012 to 2025, representing one of the steepest declines globally. Apurva also said the government cannot keep raising the SST rate while continuing to provide support measures, without triggering the negative effects of “tax-on-tax” issues inherent in the SST system. Hence, the current mechanisms are running out of steam, and it is essential for the government to outline a clear revenue mobilisation strategy, even if it does not plan to raise taxes in the near term. 

Reference:

Reviving growth via innovation, revenue, Elim Poon, The Star, 8 October 2025

Tuesday, 11 November 2025

The Rise of the Robot Nation

 

China is making and installing factory robots at a far greater pace than any other country. The United States is a distant third. More than two million robots were working in Chinese factories in 2024, according to the International Federation of Robotics (IFR). This is a trade group for makers of industrial machines.

 

Nearly 300,000 new robots were installed in 2024, more than the rest of the world combined. By contrast, American factories added 34,000. While Chinese plants have been using more robots, they have also grown far better at making them. A combination of public capital, policy directives and generous loans has spurred Chinese firms to dominate robotics and related technologies, such as semiconductors and artificial intelligence.

 


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org

 

Worldwide, robots are taking on an increasingly prominent and disruptive role in manufacturing. These range from machines that weld car parts together to claws that lift boxes onto conveyor belts. As technology improves efficiency, some factories are running with fewer workers, while others are reshaping roles entirely.

 

Over the past decade, China has pursued a broad campaign to integrate robots into its factories and become a major producer. Analysts say the strategy mirrors Beijing’s national push in electric vehicles and AI.

 

Factories in China have installed more than 150,000 robots annually since 2017. By 2025, Chinese factories were producing nearly a third of all goods worldwide – more than the United States, Germany, Japan, South Korea and Britain combined.

 

Robot installations actually fell in Japan, the United States, South Korea and Germany in 2024. Japan, the second-largest adopter, installed 44,000. Beijing made robotics a top priority in 2015 under its “Made in China 2025” campaign, aiming to cut reliance on foreign suppliers. Industries were given low-interest loans from state-controlled banks, funding for acquisitions of foreign competitors and direct injections of government money.

 

Until recently, Chinese factories installed more imported robots than domestic ones. But in 2024, nearly three-fifths of the robots installed were made in China. Overall, China has five times as many factory robots as the United States. The IFR’s data does not include humanoid robots – two-legged machines still mostly experimental.

 

China’s AI industry also plays a critical role. Firms are developing tools to track and improve every aspect of machine performance. With Beijing’s sustained backing, a swelling workforce of skilled technicians and a growing domestic supply chain, China is not just automating its factories; it is remaking global manufacturing in its own image.

 

Reference:

The rise of the robot nation, Meaghan Tobin and Keith Bradsher, The Star,
7 October 2025

 

Monday, 10 November 2025

Aerotrain: What a Disaster!

The latest aerotrain breakdown at KLIA Terminal One on 28 October happened at an ungodly timing – the final day of the 47th ASEAN Summit. That may have prompted Transport Minister to order an APAD (Land Public Transport Agency) probe on airport operator Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd (MAHB).

 

As the breakdown has become a routine affair which is contrarian to the operator’s license issued to MAHB, Loke has pointed to the Land Public Transport Act 2010 which stipulates that any breach of the operator’s license conditions may result in a fine of up to RM250,000 for each offence.



Source: https://en.wikipedia.org

 

The latest malfunction on 28 Oct, which the now privatised MAHB, was attributed to the aerotrain’s power system. This is under the responsibility of contractors IJM-PESTEC Joint Venture (IPJV) and its French manufacturer Alstom. Stranded passengers were forced to walk along the tracks in the dark while carrying their luggage.

 

The original aerotrain operation which had been running from 1998 was terminated in March 2023. Since its re-launch on 1 July 2025, the RM456 mil upgraded KLIA aerotrain (two units) had 19 reported disruptions from July 2 to Sept 30 as per official records. Further incidents occurred in October, bringing the total to 22 breakdowns.

 

If the Transport Ministry (MOT) has been stringent with MAHB from day one, the government’s coffers could have easily been RM5.5 mil richer. But that is not the purpose – it’s just penalty and “peanuts” for the supplier. Going forward, how do we ensure no further breakdowns? Buy another set from a different supplier? And remember we have VMY in 2026. Is this now the gateway to embarrassment? KLIA is the country’s first impression. Until MAHB fixes this, Malaysia is showing the world that ordinary travellers are expendable. The aerotrain is now a case study for institutional incompetence!

 

References:

RM250k penalty per aerotrain breakdown should have been imposed from outset, not after almost 2 dozen disruptions, Focus Malaysia, 29 October 2025

 

Comment: KLIA’s Aerotrain is the gateway to embarrassment, Mariam Mokhtar, Malaysiakini, 31 October 2025


Friday, 7 November 2025

Shipbuilding: Did the Malays Teach the Romans?

 

Prof Dr Solehah Yaacob, the International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) senior academician is at it again. Her latest claim is mind boggling – “the Romans learned to build ships from the Malays!” This has earned a rebuttal from Facebooker SEA Heritage & History (“SEA Heritage) that there is no strong evidence based on credible research that the Roman Empire specifically learned shipbuilding from the Ancient Malays. More likely from the Carthaginians who once controlled the Mediterranean.

 

Source: https://www.wikiwand.com

The digital creator (SEA Heritage) went on to debunk the presumed myth by “the pride of IIUM”:

   

1.      No documents – archaeological, or historical records – have been found that clearly demonstrate the Romans acquired their shipbuilding technology from the Malays. These claims often appear as legends or modern interpretations, and are not supported by adequate scientific evidence.


2.      Interaction routes between Rome and Southeast Asia did exist (through trade in India and the Indian Ocean) but direct technical influence on Roman shipbuilding from Malay technology has not been proven.

 

3.    Many such claims are classified as “myths” or “unverified hypotheses” in studies of the history of maritime relations.

While SEA Heritage & History has been very diplomatic in his rebuttal of Solehah, the same cannot be said of political commentator Prof James Chin. “I can tell you from mainstream history – including mainstream historians from this region – her entire lecture is at best pseudo-history,” reacted the inaugural director of the Asia Institute at the University of Tasmania on his FB page. “Real historians would simply label her as “nuts”! But she is a full professor at UIA and she has been saying this sort of things for the past decade. “As far as I know, UIA has never asked her to go up against other historians or even check if her work is legitimate. The fact that she is a still a professor tells you a lot about UIA, right?” 

It is one thing to break into the global arena for the right reasons and another for a comedy show! I don’t understand why she is submitting weird theories – to gain recognition or to give us a bellyache! She may need help and IIUM may want to disassociate  from this individual for the sake of their own reputation. 

Reference:

IIUM professor makes Malaysia a laughing stock by claiming “Romans learned to build ships from Malays”, Focus Malaysia, 3 November 2025