Asset
managers are always competing for assets of individuals, institutions, and
retirement accounts. In 2018 alone, asset managers gave up more than $3.5
billion in fees by reducing the expense ratios they charge for their products
(Warren Miller, 2019).
In
Miller’s publication “The Game Theory of Fund Price Wars”, he explains the
cost-cutting situation with the Dollar Auction, a game that illustrates a paradox of rational
choice theory.
How
a Dollar Auction works?
Two
players are given opportunities to repeatedly bid in an auction for a dollar
bill. The player with the highest bid wins the dollar bill. The catch is that
the second highest bidder must pay his or her highest bid as well. When player
A bids 1 cent, he will take into account if player B bids 2 cent, then he will
lose 1 cent for nothing. In other words, whenever one player offers a higher bid,
the other loses.
When
the bid is up to 1 dollar, the bidder will have neither profit nor loss. But,
if another player offers $1.01 bid and wins the dollar bill, he will only lose
1 cent instead.
People
typically start this game by calling out a small amount of money because they
figure they have little to lose. They think to themselves, "If I can win a
buck for 10 or 15 cents, I'm pretty smart." The problem is that everyone
else in the game has the same logic. When the bids approach 1 dollar, the
motivation of the bidders change: from a desire to maximize returns to
minimizing losses. Thus,
the question transforms from "How much can I win?" to "How do I
keep from losing?" At this point, the auction often goes above $1.
Funding
price wars are much like the dollar auction. The players (asset management
companies) are bidding (by making fee cuts to their funds) for dollars (asset
flows) repeatedly. And of course, nearly all asset flows go to the cheapest
funds within any given category.
|
Figure 1: Total
net flows by net expense ratio percentile within category
over the last 5
years for passive funds
Investment
fees have dropped so low but is this the end? No, if the dollar auction model
holds true. Fund companies may soon be paying investors to invest with them.
Who
wins the price wars?
In
the dollar auction, the auctioneer wins – receiving more money than auctioning
the dollar bill. Likewise, the end investor is the winner of the fund price
wars.
Although
no asset manager wins a price war, some may lose less. Firms that create
differentiated products are equivalent to potential bidders in the dollar
auction who refuse to make an initial bid. They don’t allow themselves to be
sucked into the game. Instead, these fund managers maintain their pricing power
by offering hard-to-replicate investment.
Reference:
1.
Warren Miller (2019), The Game Theory of Fund Price Wars www.flowspring.com
2.
Douglas Noll (2000), The Dollar Auction Game: A Lesson in Conflict Escalation
www.mediate.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment