Banks are expected to lose RM6.4 bil during the
loan moratorium between April and Sept, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul Abdul
Aziz said (and quoted by Focus Malaysia).
Banks stood to lose RM1.06 bil a month
based on the Malaysian Financial Reporting Standards (MFRS) 9, Zafrul told in
his reply to a question from Bagan MP Lim Guan Eng in the Dewan Rakyat.
MFRS 9, the Malaysian equivalent of
International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9), requires banks to make
provisions in anticipation of a loan turning bad, instead of the previous practice
of making provisions only when the loan has soured. As such, banks face the
prospect of having to make much higher provisions this year as they take into
account loans that could potentially go bad amid the current turmoil caused by
the Covid-19 pandemic.
“Yes,
there will likely be a significant uptick in provisions this year, which will
ultimately hurt the banks’ earnings,” a banking analyst from a local brokerage
says.
Be that as it may, those in the
accounting industry think it is unlikely that the banks here will be given a
reprieve from MFRS 9.
IFRS 9 was in the first place designed to
address the “too little too late” criticism following the 2008/09 global
financial crisis that banks were not able to account for losses until they were
incurred when it was apparent that they were coming.
Nevertheless, all eyes
will be on whether European regulators give in to the banks there, which have
only just started to recover from the last global crisis.
Analysts point out that the impact of the
pandemic goes beyond the obvious sectors like travel and tourism. It has also
indirectly affected many other sectors, particularly oil and gas (O&G)
because of the slump in oil prices, and property because of the ensuing
slowdown.
Banks will definitely
lose under a moratorium of principal repayment and interest. What banks should
be willing to consider is the deferment of principal repayment by a year while
interest is serviced. Even this could be difficult for SMEs and individuals who
have low turnover or lost employment, respectively. In any event, a complete
re-assessment of credit risk has to be done. And then perhaps a considered
acquisition of identified loans by Bank Negara/Danaharta. That will ensure
banks’ capital ratios are intact and remain viable to undertake fresh loans.
The question of moral hazard is not relevant if banks have performed the credit
rigour in the first instance. This is a better solution for all.
Image: https://www.thestar.com.my
Will banks then lose
RM6.4 billion? This is an accounting issue and relief on MFRS 9 is a moot
point. But banks have been profitable over the years and any provisioning now
could be reversed in the year ahead when conditions improve. Borrowers may also
repay in full the arrears due. The Minister seems to be on the bankers’ side
when a normal politician will have furthered the interest of the rakyat!
References:
1. Banks Ask For MFRS 9 Relief
on Worry of Provision Spike, Adeline P aul Raj, March 30, 2020 https://www.theedgemarkets.com
2. Banks Expected to
Lose RM6.4 Bil During Moratorium, Focus Malaysia
No comments:
Post a Comment