In an April 2020
Reuters poll, the majority of economists predicted a U-shaped recovery –
prolonged stagnation before recovery. Others who were more optimistic viewed a
V-shaped – a speedy recovery. And some picked “W” – a shape following a second
wave of the virus. Now the trend is a “K”.
Essentially, the concept
rests on the idea that while the fortunes of some in the economy have nearly or
fully recovered (broadly defined), the fortunes of many are still declining. Do
we find any evidence in support of this case and how does it differ from past
downturns and recoveries?
Supporters of the “K-Shaped”
recovery usually present rising asset markets as the first exhibit for their
case. Equity markets have largely recovered since pulling back earlier in the
year. And housing prices, measured by several indexes including the
Case-Shiller 20-City Index, also continued an upward trend despite the massive
contraction in real GDP.
The uneven performance in
the labor market usually represents the second piece of evidence. Different job
categories declined at different rates. Atypical of most downturns, the
lower-skilled services industries generally suffered the greatest number of job
losses. That occurred because government shutdowns forced certain businesses to
close. Consumers avoided (and continue to avoid) many businesses due to fear of
falling ill. Many of the individual occupations associated with such
businesses, such as retail salesperson, fast-food workers, and waiters/waitresses,
rank among the top 10 most common occupations in the U.S. This contraction
exacerbated job losses in the U.S. Although the labor market has recovered
somewhat over the last few months, not all segments of the market have improved
at the same speed.
Source:
https://www.corona-stocks.com
By contrast, workers who
would typically head into an office, such as those in financial services or
professional and business services, have fared much better. Job losses for
them, though still significant, total far less. Because of their ability to
sufficiently (if not efficiently) operate from home, demand for these positions
from employers has remained firm and, in some cases, increased.
Whatever the alphabet,
people on Main Street need help if recovery is to be real. The divergence
between the “haves” and “have nots” can be addressed by a tax regime that
flattens propitious gains owing to pump priming / QEs.
According to Frances
Donald of Manulife Investment Management, it is time to discard the shape of a
single alphabet – V, U, L, or K – that can represent profile of the coming
recovery. What may be more instructive is to view what lies ahead as a 3-stage
recovery with its own set of themes.
Phase
1: Rapid Rebound (up to September)
Phase
2: Stall Out (up to end 2021)
Phase
3: New Normal (beyond 2022)
During Phase 1,
recovery could rebound up to 60% of economic output lost. It may look like a V
but will not last. Why? Once government transfers peters out, household incomes
drop. This suggests governments need to continue with stimulus packages until a
vaccine is found. But that raises public debt substantially which has future
consequences.
In Phase 2, the “Stall
Out” stage, recovery could fizzle out unless more “fizz” is added to the Coke!
It is unclear which governments and when support measures are withdrawn. But
businesses will suffer in operating capacity, revenue streams, employment
numbers and reduced profitability. Defaults may increase, bankruptcies and
liquidation will follow. Consumers may remain cautious because of
uncertainties. The looming problems of trade and Brexit will exacerbate the
discomfort of a “Stall Out”. Then there is the U.S. Presidential election and
its fall-out!
In Phase 3,
de-globalisation and its attendant developments will change supply chains.
Alternative arrangements and decoupling become the new focus. Many nations will
realise their fiscal position is in terrible shape. Interest rates remain at or
below zero for a fair period in the foreseeable future. Rise of interest rates
may happen in 2025 or thereafter. Many “zombie” firms will crash once reality
sinks in. Governments need to look at new ways of improving productivity.
Covid-19 has brought
uncertainty and confusion to both the financial and real markets. Decisive
actions by some governments has reduced the emergence of a full-blown global
crisis. It is time to look at scenario development and measures tailored to
both local and international requirements.
References:
1. K-shaped recovery taking hold of emerging markets, Starbiz, Friday, 4
September 2020.
2. The case for a “K-shaped” recovery? Jones Lang LaSalle IP, Inc.,
August 18, 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment