Patent
counting is often used as the metric to determine a company’s contribution to
innovation. However, quantifying this leadership may give a misleading picture
in determining who is leading the way. Having a lot of patents is impressive,
but a patent is sometimes more about the resources that a company dedicates to
the process of filing patents than it does to the value and impact of those
patents.
Many
reports on 5G patents show that Chinese companies have the most 5G patents, leaving
the impression that China is ahead of the game. But a closer examination of the
data finds that this may not be true.
Courtesy of
Bird & Bird
A
simple count of patent declarations assumes that all patents are of equal
value. When counting declarations, applying the essentiality filter used in the
seminal Unwired Planet v Huawei case in the English High Court reverses the
view that Chinese companies are leading the 5G patent race.
IAM media
The
figure above shows Ericsson, Samsung and Qualcomm taking the top spots when an essentiality
filter is applied.
Patent
Sight by LexisNexis has also developed a unique methodology that considers the
importance of the patent in the hierarchy of the technologies, its geographical
coverage, and other parameters to provide a score called the Patent Asset Index.
While many companies cluster in their patent portfolio size or number of
patents, Qualcomm leads the pack in value and impact based on Patent Asset
Index.
Patent Sight
If
we look at the portfolio size, the number of patents declared between Qualcomm,
Huawei, Intel (now Apple), and Samsung are close. However, when it comes to
value, Qualcomm is considerably higher than the next competitor.
The
number of patents a company declares does not necessarily reflect the value or
contribution of these patents. Not only for 5G, but there are companies that
try to demonstrate their contribution to certain technologies based on the
number of patents, and that is a mistake.
This article is not intended to provide a
conclusion on which company is leading 5G development, but to show the
sensitivity of ranking based on different assumptions and parameters. So, one
could say that others not Huawei leads the race on 5G, but politics will suggest
otherwise.
Reference:
1. Matthew Noble, Jane Mutimear and
Richard Vary, Determining which companies are leading the 5G race, July/Aug
2019, www.IAM-media.com
2.
Christina
Petersson, Why you shouldn’t believe everything you read about 5G patents, 11
Oct 2019, www.ericsson.com
3. Patrick Moorhead, Why 5G Patent
‘Value’ Is More Important Than The ‘Number’ Of Patents, 27 Feb 2020, www.forbes.com
No comments:
Post a Comment